1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01112618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historic preservation: A comparative analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban preservation and urban growth are often considered to be two contradictory processes. Urban preservation refers to the maintenance and repair of existing historic structures, including historical monuments and vernacular dwellings (or 'urban texture': Choay, 2001;Fitch, 1982;Barthel, 1989). Urban growth, in comparison, is usually achieved through the demolition of old structures and the intensification of land use.…”
Section: Preservation As Growth: Re-conceptualising the Growth Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban preservation and urban growth are often considered to be two contradictory processes. Urban preservation refers to the maintenance and repair of existing historic structures, including historical monuments and vernacular dwellings (or 'urban texture': Choay, 2001;Fitch, 1982;Barthel, 1989). Urban growth, in comparison, is usually achieved through the demolition of old structures and the intensification of land use.…”
Section: Preservation As Growth: Re-conceptualising the Growth Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In communicating the past the F.R.C.C. sought to control the present, shaping the identity of place through a process of social mapping, instructing post-War generations in how to read a landscape (Barthel 1989). The experience of the War and the question of how to memorialise fallen comrades had thus fundamentally changed club members' attitudes to mass access.…”
Section: Death and The Great War 1914-18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic of historic preservation has received relatively little attention from sociologists and other social scientists. Studies on the topic fall broadly into three categories: (1) gentrification and progrowth politics (Reichl 1997, 1999; Smith 1996; Zukin 1982, 1987); (2) the history of the preservation movement, its organizational failures, and its followers (Barthel 1989; Fellows 2004; Jones 2003; Lofland 2003; Page and Mason 2004; Urry 2002); and (3) collective memory (Barthel 1996b; Boyer 1994; Hayden 1997; Walton 2001). The gentrification literature mentions historic preservation as a factor in gentrification, mainly focusing on larger residential or commercial projects by developers or on urban streetscapes.…”
Section: The Sociological Study Of Historic Preservationmentioning
confidence: 99%