1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf02233509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathology of the upper small intestines in typhoid fever

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that penetration by S. enteritidis occurs in the upper half of the gastrointestinal tract, which possibly indicates sites that are more easily penetrated by S. enteritidis. This finding is compatible with results obtained in previous studies, which showed that S. enteritidis has a rapid transit time through the normal mouse intestine; a small proportion of the inoculum establishes itself within the walls of the small intestine, before a systemic infection can be demonstrated [4,5,19] . However, these studies were unable to precisely establish the primary site of bacterial invasion in these animals.…”
Section: Wwwwjgnetcomsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We suggest that penetration by S. enteritidis occurs in the upper half of the gastrointestinal tract, which possibly indicates sites that are more easily penetrated by S. enteritidis. This finding is compatible with results obtained in previous studies, which showed that S. enteritidis has a rapid transit time through the normal mouse intestine; a small proportion of the inoculum establishes itself within the walls of the small intestine, before a systemic infection can be demonstrated [4,5,19] . However, these studies were unable to precisely establish the primary site of bacterial invasion in these animals.…”
Section: Wwwwjgnetcomsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Gastroenteritis and typhoid fever differ dramatically with regard to symptoms and pathological changes, including the cellular composition of inflammatory infiltrates in the intestine (Santos et al, 2001;Zhang et al, 2003). While gastroenteritis is characterized by intestinal infiltrates that are dominated by neutrophils, this cell type is scarce in infiltrates of typhoid fever patients (Sprinz et al, 1966;Day et al, 1978;Mukawi, 1978;McGovern and Slavutin, 1979;Kraus et al, 1999;Nguyen et al, 2004). The genetic differences between non-typhoidal and typhoidal Salmonella serotypes that account for the different intestinal responses are poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. Typhi is the causative agent of typhoid fever, a severe systemic infection in which neutrophils are scarce in intestinal infiltrates (Sprinz et al, 1966;Mukawi, 1978;Kraus et al, 1999;Nguyen et al, 2004) and fecal leucocyte populations (Harris et al, 1972;Alvarado, 1983;Guyot et al, 1984). Infection of human colonic tissue explants with a nontyphoidal Salmonella serotype, S. Typhimurium, results in expression of the neutrophil chemoattractant interleukin (IL)-8, but this response is not observed during infection with S. Typhi (Raffatellu et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which helps explain the scarcity of neutrophils in intestinal infiltrates [28][29][30][31][32] and the long incubation period of typhoid fever. 27 A viaB-mediated inhibition of pyroptosis might also reduce exposure of S. typhi to neutrophil attack.…”
Section: Do Not Distributementioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Although S. typhi causes intestinal inflammation, the inflammatory infiltrates are dominated by mononuclear cells and neutrophils are scarce. [28][29][30][31][32] Finally, S. typhi causes a disseminated bloodstream infection in immunocompetent individuals, while non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars are associated with a localized gastroenteritis. These clinical observations raise the question of how pathogens that are so similar in their basic repertoire of virulence factors can cause so different host responses and disease manifestations in humans.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%