1996
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7049.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathology departments already audit diagnostic errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in major teaching hospitals with active internal audit there remains an error rate of clinically important deficiencies of around 1.1-1.4%, and errors of less importance in 3-4%. 9 More active prospective approaches such as routine review of every case by a second pathologist have been shown to identify and hence reduce the number of important errors in reports. 10 11 There is probably room for a change in thinking on this issue of diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: A Jack Of All Trades and Master Of None?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in major teaching hospitals with active internal audit there remains an error rate of clinically important deficiencies of around 1.1-1.4%, and errors of less importance in 3-4%. 9 More active prospective approaches such as routine review of every case by a second pathologist have been shown to identify and hence reduce the number of important errors in reports. 10 11 There is probably room for a change in thinking on this issue of diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: A Jack Of All Trades and Master Of None?mentioning
confidence: 99%