2021
DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.200170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathology and Ultrastructural Findings of Fatal COVID-19 Infections on Testis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
106
1
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
106
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In Reply.-We thank Dr Iakymenko and colleagues for their comments and description of transmission electron microscopy findings. 1,2 While we and others did not observe direct virus invasion in the testis, other recent studies have found the presence of the virus particles in the testicular parenchyma when using various modalities (transmission electron microscopy, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridization studies). 3 The infrequency or inability to detect viral particles in the testis raises different possibilities: that either tissue sampling, the timing of tissue sampling, or the sensitivity of the detection method may play a role.…”
contrasting
confidence: 42%
“…In Reply.-We thank Dr Iakymenko and colleagues for their comments and description of transmission electron microscopy findings. 1,2 While we and others did not observe direct virus invasion in the testis, other recent studies have found the presence of the virus particles in the testicular parenchyma when using various modalities (transmission electron microscopy, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridization studies). 3 The infrequency or inability to detect viral particles in the testis raises different possibilities: that either tissue sampling, the timing of tissue sampling, or the sensitivity of the detection method may play a role.…”
contrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Transmission electron microscopy performed in 3 out 12 cases was not able to identify SARS-CoV-2 viral particles, while RT-PCR was able to detect the virus in one case [108]. This lymphocytic and macrophage infiltration was confirmed by more recent studies in six autoptic samples by Achua et al, along finding of normal spermatogenesis in 50% of the samples and various abnormalities of spermatogenesis in the remaining 50% [109]. Moreover, Li et al evaluated six testicular and epididymal autoptic specimens and found interstitial edema, congestion, red blood cell exudation in testes/epididymides and thinning of seminiferous tubules, with an increased concentration of CD3+ and CD68+ in the interstitium.…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 and Testismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In situ hybridization has failed, at the moment, to find both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in the testicular tissue (50,(66)(67)(68), while there is a report of SARS-CoV-2 particle detection in one testis specimen by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), possibly associated with high viral load (66). A testicular specimen analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) recently demonstrated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in a single autopsy of an infected COVID-19 patient (69).…”
Section: Testis and Semenmentioning
confidence: 99%