2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00393-010-0609-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathologischer Degenerations-Score des Faserknorpels

Abstract: Although histopathology of meniscal degeneration plays an important role, no criteria to assess severity of the degeneration are available to date. Our aim was to create a histopathological scoring system for meniscal degeneration with good interobserver variability, taking matrix degradation and cellularity in meniscal tissue into consideration. Degeneration is classified as follows: grade 1 (low), grade 2 (intermediate), grade 3 (high). The pattern of NITEGE deposits (G1 fragment of aggrecan) was assessed im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some slides of meniscal tissue after ACLR additional pronounced mucoid changes which are characterized by less stained and overstained areas (circle in Fig 2D ) in accordance with separation and the formation of tears and multiple obvious matrix clefts have been seen mainly in the PI ( Fig 2D ) but also in the AH (Grade 3). Other criteria for high-grade degeneration that have been described previously [ 38 , 39 ] such as polymorphism of chondrocytes and fat accumulations were rare in the menisci of the current study. The lateral meniscus after ACLR showed none of the degenerative changes of this type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some slides of meniscal tissue after ACLR additional pronounced mucoid changes which are characterized by less stained and overstained areas (circle in Fig 2D ) in accordance with separation and the formation of tears and multiple obvious matrix clefts have been seen mainly in the PI ( Fig 2D ) but also in the AH (Grade 3). Other criteria for high-grade degeneration that have been described previously [ 38 , 39 ] such as polymorphism of chondrocytes and fat accumulations were rare in the menisci of the current study. The lateral meniscus after ACLR showed none of the degenerative changes of this type.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…For histological evaluation a published score for human meniscal tissue degeneration [ 30 , 39 ] had to be adapted as described before [ 32 ] since there is, to our knowledge, no other published scoring system for meniscal degeneration of porcine tissue. The lateral menisci from both knee joints and the medial meniscus from the right knee joint (control) showed mainly normal meniscal tissue that is homogenous matrix staining and high cellularity with uniform morphology of the chondrocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human meniscal degeneration has also been described by several authors [18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 31, 32, 35–37, 39, 4449]. However, most of the grading systems for meniscus pathology are MRI-based, and describe tears and grades of mucoid degeneration [19, 5053].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, little is known of meniscus aging, at macroscopic and histopathologic levels. Most studies of animal and human tissue developed specialized evaluation systems to capture specific features of interest such as cellularity and matrix organization [11, 18, 20, 24, 25]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain-based assessment of RA synovium is feasible for large numbers of patients undergoing interventional procedures, since it is a routine offering by clinical pathology laboratories. The Krenn scoring system of H&E-stained synovial tissue involves assessment of 3 histologic features: synovial lining hyperplasia, synoviocyte stromal density, and leukocyte infiltration (710). Although the presence of high-grade synovitis has a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 96% for the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases, it does not discriminate between subtypes of rheumatic diseases, such as RA versus psoriatic arthritis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%