2014
DOI: 10.1186/s13028-014-0045-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathological findings, phenotyping of inflammatory cells, and expression of markers of nitritative injury in joint tissue samples from calves after vaccination and intraarticular challenge with Mycoplasma bovis strain 1067

Abstract: BackgroundThe pathogenesis of caseonecrotic lesions developing in lungs and joints of calves infected with Mycoplasma bovis is not clear and attempts to prevent M. bovis-induced disease by vaccines have been largely unsuccessful. In this investigation, joint samples from 4 calves, i.e. 2 vaccinated and 2 non-vaccinated, of a vaccination experiment with intraarticular challenge were examined. The aim was to characterize the histopathological findings, the phenotypes of inflammatory cells, the expression of clas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect on cellular immunity would further contribute to general immune dysregulation by strains, such as brain isolate UFG1, that elicit comparatively low IFN-␥ or TNF-␣ responses. This pattern is consistent with DH82 cell MHC-II receptor downregulation caused by infection with the obligate intracellular canine pathogen Ehrlichia canis (36) and with the paucity of MHC-II-expressing macrophages in necrotic joint lesions of calves infected with Mycoplasma bovis by intra-articular challenge (76) but contrasts with the marked upregulation of MHC-II-expressing airway epithelial cells following intranasal inoculation of rats with Mycoplasma pulmonis (77).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…This effect on cellular immunity would further contribute to general immune dysregulation by strains, such as brain isolate UFG1, that elicit comparatively low IFN-␥ or TNF-␣ responses. This pattern is consistent with DH82 cell MHC-II receptor downregulation caused by infection with the obligate intracellular canine pathogen Ehrlichia canis (36) and with the paucity of MHC-II-expressing macrophages in necrotic joint lesions of calves infected with Mycoplasma bovis by intra-articular challenge (76) but contrasts with the marked upregulation of MHC-II-expressing airway epithelial cells following intranasal inoculation of rats with Mycoplasma pulmonis (77).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…surface proteins (VSPs) (4). To date, limited success is achieved in the treatment or control of disease associated with M. bovis due to its virulence and persistent nature, restrictions on antimicrobial drug usage in food animals, the emergence of drugresistant strains (5,6), and vaccination attempts that confer limited protection (7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-challenge, the clinical disease and the joint lesions in the vaccinated calves were similar to those observed in the non-vaccinates, which was additionally confirmed by histopathology [25,26]. To some extent, the vaccine partially reduced M. bovis joint colonization; however, it did not protect against the M. bovis spreading from the inoculated to non-inoculated joints, which was observed in both examined groups of calves [25,26]. Similar poor results were seen with another formalinized vaccine which failed to protect against M. bovis arthritis in calves [27].…”
Section: Adjuvant/inactivator Used In the Vaccine Preparationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The vaccine did not protect against the effects of articular challenge with the virulent M. bovis strain, despite effective stimulation of the humoral response. Post-challenge, the clinical disease and the joint lesions in the vaccinated calves were similar to those observed in the non-vaccinates, which was additionally confirmed by histopathology [25,26]. To some extent, the vaccine partially reduced M. bovis joint colonization; however, it did not protect against the M. bovis spreading from the inoculated to non-inoculated joints, which was observed in both examined groups of calves [25,26].…”
Section: Adjuvant/inactivator Used In the Vaccine Preparationmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation