1994
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(94)90090-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathological evaluation of scalds and contact burns in the pig model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
72
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have shown that pulmonary damage appeared more quickly and was more pronounced with a hot saturated air jet compared to a dry jet. Although several studies have been made on burns or scalds on the skin due to conductive or convective exposures (Brans et al 1994;Bull 1963;Lawrence and Bull 1976;Ripple et al 1990;Siekmann 1989Siekmann , 1990, we were unable to find any studies dealing with hot water steam injuries and skin damage. Different biological risks appear during accidental exposure to superheated water steam .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These studies have shown that pulmonary damage appeared more quickly and was more pronounced with a hot saturated air jet compared to a dry jet. Although several studies have been made on burns or scalds on the skin due to conductive or convective exposures (Brans et al 1994;Bull 1963;Lawrence and Bull 1976;Ripple et al 1990;Siekmann 1989Siekmann , 1990, we were unable to find any studies dealing with hot water steam injuries and skin damage. Different biological risks appear during accidental exposure to superheated water steam .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Experimental models of partial thickness burn injury have been established in a number of mammalian species, including large mammals, such as pigs [2,3] and dogs [4,5], and small mammals, including guinea pigs [7,8] and rats [17][18][19]. While pig models share close anatomical similarities with human skin, and scald injuries are reepithelialized within 14 -21 days [3], the large size and high cost of these animals make this model less desirable for initial wound healing studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While pig models share close anatomical similarities with human skin, and scald injuries are reepithelialized within 14 -21 days [3], the large size and high cost of these animals make this model less desirable for initial wound healing studies. Previous descriptions of smaller animal burn models required in excess of 16 -18 days for complete reepithelialization [6 -8], with rats requiring over 30 days in untreated wounds [17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] When defining present model, rats were selected because they are easily acquired, inexpensive, and easy to manipulate compared to larger animals. Due to need for only conventional infrared heater and rats, model offers genuinely low cost alternative for burn studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%