1964
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(64)91831-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathologic Findings Following Scleral Buckling*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was shown in previous studies in which nonabsorbable scleral buckling materials either experimentally or surgically implanted under the conjunctiva became encapsulated [11][12][13][14]. Experimental capsule formation around silicone was observed as early as 3 days after its implantation [15].…”
Section: Capsulementioning
confidence: 66%
“…This was shown in previous studies in which nonabsorbable scleral buckling materials either experimentally or surgically implanted under the conjunctiva became encapsulated [11][12][13][14]. Experimental capsule formation around silicone was observed as early as 3 days after its implantation [15].…”
Section: Capsulementioning
confidence: 66%
“…The two major histological findings in this study are continuous encapsulation surrounding the PCL stents and chronic giant cell granulomatous inflammation beside the explants. The capsule around the episcleral explants was previously demonstrated in several studies 24–27. The tense capsule separates the polymeric stent from surrounding normal tissue and restricts the migration of the explant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In histopathological studies of eyes treated for retinal detachment (Boniuk & Zimmerman 1961a;1961b, 1965Kornblueth et al 1964;Witschel & Faulhorn 1978;Wilson & Green 1987;Barr 1990), the largest series includes forty-three eyes with silicone and three with polyethylene tubes all obtained from autopsies (Wilson & Green 1987). As in two other studies, the buckling procedure was not much detailed (Witschel & Faulhorn 1978;Barr 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to compare the buckling effect of materials different in nature, shape, size, thickness, extensibility, elasticity, hardness, location in the eye, and without information on the tightening of the encircling band. An hourglass shape can be ascribed to such an excessive tightening (Schepens 1983a;Kornblueth et al 1964). Scleral invagination also depends on scleral rigidity, intraocular pressure, and the distance between the material edge and the scleral bite of anchoring sutures (Haynie & D'Amico 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%