1999
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histone modification governs the cell cycle regulation of a replication-independent chromatin assembly pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: We describe a replication-independent, cell cycle-regulated chromatin assembly pathway in budding yeast. The activity of this pathway is low in S phase extracts but is very high in G 2 , M, and G 1 cell extracts, with peak activity in late M͞early G 1 . The cell cycle regulation of this pathway requires a specific pattern of posttranslational modification of histones H3 and͞or H4, which is distinct for H3͞H4 present in S phase versus M and G 1 phase cell extracts. Histone H3͞H4 modification is therefore import… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Against a background of degradation of free hyperacetylated histones, this mechanism would drive global replacement of hyper-with hypoacetylated histones. This idea is consistent with our evidence that chromatin assembly in vitro is responsive to the state of histone modification (3,50) and that extracts from APC10 (this study) and APC5 (25) mutants have a defect in assembly activity. In order to critically test this possibility, it will be necessary to identify the assembly factors that are active in the crude yeast assembly system and to test their use of modified versus unmodified histones during active proliferation and in G 0 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Against a background of degradation of free hyperacetylated histones, this mechanism would drive global replacement of hyper-with hypoacetylated histones. This idea is consistent with our evidence that chromatin assembly in vitro is responsive to the state of histone modification (3,50) and that extracts from APC10 (this study) and APC5 (25) mutants have a defect in assembly activity. In order to critically test this possibility, it will be necessary to identify the assembly factors that are active in the crude yeast assembly system and to test their use of modified versus unmodified histones during active proliferation and in G 0 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We previously discovered that mutation of the conserved APC5 subunit of the APC inhibits replication-independent chromatin assembly in a yeast extract (25). The reaction in this system is also sensitive to mutation of amino-terminal lysines in H4 that can be acetylated in vivo, and H3 and H4 from G 2 /M cells are better substrates for assembly in the extract than are H3 and H4 from S-phase cells (3,46,50). It follows that a defect in histone metabolism may underlie the assembly defect of extract from apc5 mutant cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Work in budding yeast revealed that none of the subunits of complexes involved in RC assembly in vitro is essential for growth, suggesting that in vivo, there are redundant mechanisms for RC assembly. The fact that much of yeast chromatin is assembled in a replication-independent (RI) manner (Altheim and Schultz 1999) provides a rationale for this evident redundancy. As we shall see, histone variants are typically deposited by RI nucleosome assembly.…”
Section: Bulk Histones Are Deposited After Dna Replicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it has been demonstrated that nucleosomes can be assembled or reassembled independently of DNA replication. Replication-independent (RI) assembly is not limited to the S phase but occurs continually throughout the cell cycle (2,4), perhaps functioning as a backup to RC assembly (44). RI assembly can introduce specific histone variants, such as the H3 variant Cid, at centrosomes (1) or histone H3.3 in transcriptionally active regions of the genome (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%