2017
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histone degradation in response to DNA damage enhances chromatin dynamics and recombination rates

Abstract: Nucleosomes are essential for proper chromatin organization and the maintenance of genome integrity. Histones are post-translationally modified and often evicted at sites of DNA breaks, facilitating the recruitment of repair factors. Whether such chromatin changes are localized or genome-wide is debated. Here we show that cellular levels of histones drop 20-40% in response to DNA damage. This histone loss occurs from chromatin, is proteasome-mediated and requires both the DNA damage checkpoint and the INO80 nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
270
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(297 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(47 reference statements)
24
270
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the increase in somatic HR produced in fas1-4 would be mainly due to high levels of DSBs derived from stalled DNA replication forks (Gao et al, 2012). Alternatively, it has been proposed that histone loss enhances chromatin dynamics and recombination rates (Hauer et al, 2017). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the increase in somatic HR produced in fas1-4 would be mainly due to high levels of DSBs derived from stalled DNA replication forks (Gao et al, 2012). Alternatively, it has been proposed that histone loss enhances chromatin dynamics and recombination rates (Hauer et al, 2017). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a checkpoint-mediated disruption of centromeres anchoring has recently been proposed to participate in this DSB-induced chromatin mobility (Strecker et al 2016). Second, a change in chromatin stiffness caused by both local and global chromatin remodelling may account for increased motion (Hauer et al 2017). The increase of DSB ends mobility also depends on the recombination proteins Rad51, Rad54, and has thereby been proposed to promote recombination by allowing efficient scanning of the genome to find the appropriate template for repair Miné-Hattab and Rothstein 2012).…”
Section: Increasing Mobility: a Functional Requirement For Homology Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, nucleosomes are thought to be an obstacle for the DNA damage repair machinery and thus must be removed. Indeed, following UV damage ubiquitination-mediated histone mobilization has been reported (Wang et al 2006;Lan et al 2012;Adam et al 2013) and in the case of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in yeast, histone ChIP experiments showed a local depletion around an induced DSB (van Attikum et al 2004Attikum et al , 2007, as well as a global loss of histones at high levels of Zeocin-or γIR-induced DNA damage (Hauer et al 2017). Local histone release was shown to depend on the activity of nucleosome remodelers BRG1/RSC and/ or INO80 (van Attikum et al 2004(van Attikum et al , 2007Zhao et al 2009;Jiang et al 2010).…”
Section: The Two-faced Role Of Heterochromatin In Dna Damage and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%