In nonneuronal cells, herpes simplex virus 1 overcomes host defenses, replicates, and ultimately kills the infected cell. Among the host defenses suppressed by the virus is a repressor complex whose key components are histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 or 2, RE-1 silencing transcription factor (REST), corepressor of REST (CoREST), and lysinespecific demethylase (LSD) 1. In neurons innervating cells at the portal of entry into the body, the virus establishes a "latent" infection in which viral DNA is silenced with the exception of a family of genes. The question posed here is whether the virus hijacks this repressor complex to silence itself in neurons during the latent state. To test this hypothesis, we inserted into the wild-type virus genome a wild-type REST [recombinant (R) 111], a dominant-negative REST (dnREST) lacking the N-and C-terminal repressor domains (R112), or an insertion control consisting of tandem repeats of stop codons (R113). The recombinant virus R112 carrying the dnREST replicated better and was more virulent than the wild-type parent or the other recombinant viruses when administered by the corneal or i.p. routes. Moreover, in contrast to other recombinants, corneal route inoculation by R112 recombinant virus resulted in higher DNA copy numbers, higher levels of infectious virus in eye, trigeminal ganglion, or brain, and virtually complete destruction of trigeminal ganglia in mice that may ultimately succumb to infection. These results support an earlier conclusion that the HDAC/CoREST/REST/LSD1 repressor complex is a significant component of the host innate immunity and are consistent with the hypothesis that HSV-1 hijacks the repressor to silence itself during latent infection.chromatin remodeling | herpesviruses | latency H erpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) replicates at the portal of entry into the body, infects sensory nerve endings, and is transported retrograde to the neuronal nucleus (reviewed in ref. 1). In mice, a common animal model system, the virus replicates in some neurons but is silenced and establishes a latent infection in other neurons. Thus, infectious virus is readily detected during the first 10-15 d after infection at a peripheral site. It then disappears, and by day 28 only latent virus is present in the ganglia. One explanation for the two different outcomes of infection is that on release of the viral DNA into the nucleus, the cell attempts to silence the DNA. This attempt leads to a silent, latent infection in neurons but not in cells at the portal of entry into the body or in cell cultures in which the virus replicates. The fundamental question posed in the studies reported here is whether the silencing system suppressed by the virus in productively infected cells is enabled to establish a silent, "latent" infection in neurons.Specifically, several lines of evidence indicate that in infected cells, ICP0, an α (immediate-early) protein, plays a crucial role in enabling viral replication at low multiplicities of infection. At the portal of entry, the genes encoding α protein...