2017
DOI: 10.1101/lm.045799.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histone deacetylase inhibition induces odor preference memory extension and maintains enhanced AMPA receptor expression in the rat pup model

Abstract: Histone deacetylase (HDAC) plays a role in synaptic plasticity and long-term memory formation. We hypothesized that trichostatin-A (TSA), an HDAC inhibitor, would promote long-term odor preference memory and maintain enhanced GluA1 receptor levels that have been hypothesized to support memory. We used an early odor preference learning model in neonate rat pups that normally produces only 24-h memory to test behavior and examine receptor protein expression. Our behavioral studies showed that intrabulbar infusio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, several studies have shown that HDAC inhibitors regulate glutamate receptor expression. ( Bhattacharya et al ., 2017 ; Xing et al ., 2019 ), however, the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. We found for the first time MeBib, a HDAC6 inhibitor, suppressed the MA seeking response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several studies have shown that HDAC inhibitors regulate glutamate receptor expression. ( Bhattacharya et al ., 2017 ; Xing et al ., 2019 ), however, the molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. We found for the first time MeBib, a HDAC6 inhibitor, suppressed the MA seeking response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we chose "odor only" pups as controls since neither odor only or stroking only produces pCREB increases in mitral cells (McLean et al 1999), but the novel peppermint odor would have activated the mitral cells being dissected. Naive pups, pups with stroking only, pups that were subject to training procedures, but did not show behavioral evidence of having learned, and pups given a single odor + stroking trial and a pharmacological manipulation to induce multiple-day memory (Bhattacharya et al 2017) as well as those given training parameters that engage only short-term or intermediate-term memory, which don't depend on transcription, (Grimes et al 2011) will be important comparisons for a fuller understanding the roles of the changes described here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%