Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate histomorphometric variables, the amount of new bone (NB), residual graft (RG) particles and soft tissue (ST), related to various grafting materials and assess the effect of graft healing time on different histomorphometric outcomes. Studies that were published before October 2015 were electronically and manually searched in three databases. We included human studies that reported the amount of NB, RG and ST in the biopsies taken from the grafted sinuses. Based on the applied grafting materials, extracted data were categorized into different groups. Furthermore, extracted data were classified into three groups based on healing time: (i) ≤ 4.5 mo; (ii) 4.5-9 mo; and (iii) ≥ 9-13.5 mo. The search provided 791 titles. Full text analysis was performed for 258 articles resulting in 136 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Autogenous bone (AB) resulted in the highest amount of NB and lowest amount of RG compared to other grafting materials. Based on this meta-analysis, a significant difference was noticed in the amount of NB formation in grafts with a healing time of > 4.5 mo when compared to the grafts with less healing time. However, when comparing biopsies taken at 4.5-9 mo of healing (average = 6.22 mo) to the ones taken at ≥ 9-13.5 mo (average = 10.36 mo), no significant difference was noticed in the amount of NB formation of various grafts except allografts that resulted in a significantly higher percentage of NB at 9.5 mo of healing. Based on histomorphometric analysis, AB results in the highest amount of NB formation in comparison to the other grafting materials. Bone substitute materials (allografts, alloplastic materials and xenografts) seem to be good alternatives to autogenous bone and can be considered as grafting materials to avoid disadvantages related to AB, including morbidity rate, limited availability and high volumetric change. Combining AB with alloplastic materials and xenografts brings no significant advantages regarding NB formation.

BMP9 promotes osteogenic differentiation of SMSCs by activating the JNK/Smad2/3 signaling pathway

“…Bone engineering makes refractory bone defect reconstruction feasible and the key lies in the selection of seed cells . Multiple studies have demonstrated that SMSCs possess the extensive proliferative ability and multilineage differentiation potential . Our current study demonstrated that SMSCs were similar to other stem cells in terms of immunophenotypes and could be differentiated into osteoblasts in vitro.…”

Comparison between mineralized cancellous bone allograft and an alloplast material for sinus augmentation: A split mouth histomorphometric study

“…An optimal bone substitute biomaterial should act as a temporary scaffold for supporting the adhesion, growth, proliferation, and differentiation of the “seed” cells and should also degrade into nontoxic products that can be metabolized via physiological mechanisms . Osseoconductive materials (materials that enhance bone formation on their surface), including freeze‐dried bone allograft (FDBA), demineralized freeze‐dried bone allograft (DFDBA), xenografts produced from bovine bone (BB), porcine bone (PB), and alloplastic materials (β‐tricalcium phosphate [TCP] and hydroxyapatite [HA]), as well as combinations such as that of HA and α‐ and β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP) may allow new bone formation, thus constituting a scaffold that serves to stabilize the bone clot and support bone growth during the early healing phase . Recently, osteoinductive materials, including scaffolds enriched with recombinant osteoinductive factors (such as bone morphogenetic protein‐2 [rhBMP‐2]) have been claimed to enhance bone formation by stimulating the bone regeneration process .…”

SEM-EDX Study of the Degradation Process of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures

“…The maxillary sinus elevation procedure is currently considered the most predictable of pre-prosthetic surgical techniques. Maxillary sinus grafting, combined with Schneiderian membrane elevation, has been proposed to re-establish the ideal quantity and quality of bone prior to implant [4]. …”