2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2012.00987.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histomorphometric Analysis and Regional Variations of Full Thickness Skin Grafts in Dogs

Abstract: Thickness of the epidermis and dermis is dependent on body region. Hair follicle density in the FTSG specimens was decreased compared with intact skin specimens, which may affect hair regrowth in FTSG.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the epidermis thickness depends on the dog's body, but it does not affect the electric field distribution at simulated tissues (data not shown). The epidermis and SC thickness of dogs (0.020 mm ) are thinner than those of humans (0.051 mm ). The dermis is the second layer of skin, beneath the epidermal layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in the epidermis thickness depends on the dog's body, but it does not affect the electric field distribution at simulated tissues (data not shown). The epidermis and SC thickness of dogs (0.020 mm ) are thinner than those of humans (0.051 mm ). The dermis is the second layer of skin, beneath the epidermal layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Figure shows the results of a superficial dermal tumor model. The epidermis and SC thickness is 0.06 mm , dermis thickness is 1 mm , muscle thickness is 5 mm , and tumor diameter is 2.9 mm. The thickness values are applied for dogs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another three studies measured abdominal skin thickness by using skin biopsy. In those studies, skin thickness in normal dogs was reported as 1.3 ± 0.34 mm [ 25 ], 0.95 ± 0.11 mm [ 4 ], and 0.62 mm [ 27 ]. The results in the first two studies [ 4 25 ] were similar to the results of this study, probably because they measured beagles, a small dog breed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those studies, skin thickness in normal dogs was reported as 1.3 ± 0.34 mm [ 25 ], 0.95 ± 0.11 mm [ 4 ], and 0.62 mm [ 27 ]. The results in the first two studies [ 4 25 ] were similar to the results of this study, probably because they measured beagles, a small dog breed. The results of another study [ 27 ] showed significantly thinner skin than the mean skin thickness of this study, but the breed was not identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%