1925
DOI: 10.1007/bf01959338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologische Hodenbefunde bei Sexualverbrechern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1926
1926
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of the Leydig cells presented by Roosen-Runge (1956) and Ahmad et al (1969) is within the range of the present investigation, in both studies an ample number of hits and fields were counted. T h e volume density of the remaining extra-tubular tissue tallies well with the results presented in previous studies (Benoit 1922;Slotopolsky & Schinz 1925;Roosen-Runge 1956).…”
Section: Comparisons With Preuiouj Stereological Studiessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of the Leydig cells presented by Roosen-Runge (1956) and Ahmad et al (1969) is within the range of the present investigation, in both studies an ample number of hits and fields were counted. T h e volume density of the remaining extra-tubular tissue tallies well with the results presented in previous studies (Benoit 1922;Slotopolsky & Schinz 1925;Roosen-Runge 1956).…”
Section: Comparisons With Preuiouj Stereological Studiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Roosen-Runge (1956) found a larger volume density of this compartment, but as is explained in the section on experimental errors this can partly be attributed to an artefact caused by the preparation of the sections. Benoit (1922) as well as Slotopolsky & Schinz (1925) used planimetry for volumetric analysis and frcm their studies a larger volume density of the Leydig cells evolved than found in the present study. However, this difference can be attributed to the method that was used by these authors.…”
Section: Comparisons With Preuiouj Stereological Studiessupporting
confidence: 50%