2007
DOI: 10.1021/cm0625427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological, Spectroscopic, and Surface Analysis of Microdamage in Bone:  Toward Real-Time Analysis Using Fluorescent Sensors

Abstract: This paper describes the characterization of microdamage in bones histologically, spectroscopically, and by surface analysis. A set of fluorescent (photoinduced electron transfer, PET) sensors, bearing phenyliminodiacetate moieties as ion receptors, was used to investigate the selective labeling of microdamage in bones, which can have significant value for analysis of bone structures in humans. Scratched and unscratched surfaces of the bone were studied using fluorescence microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, SEM, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Staining by BaSO 4 precipitation was non-specific for damage, including all void spaces such as vasculature and free surfaces, and the staining solutions were not biocompatible. Specificity could be greatly improved by molecular or particulate contrast agents with functional groups that enable preferential binding to calcium exposed on the surfaces of microcracks or diffuse damage (Parkesh et al, 2007). Such a contrast agent could be delivered during the accumulation of damage in bone in situ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Staining by BaSO 4 precipitation was non-specific for damage, including all void spaces such as vasculature and free surfaces, and the staining solutions were not biocompatible. Specificity could be greatly improved by molecular or particulate contrast agents with functional groups that enable preferential binding to calcium exposed on the surfaces of microcracks or diffuse damage (Parkesh et al, 2007). Such a contrast agent could be delivered during the accumulation of damage in bone in situ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to image microdamage in vivo with a sodium fluoride (Na 18 F) contrast agent (Li et al, 2005;Silva et al, 2006). Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was used to detect microdamage in vitro with lead sulfide (PbS) (Leng et al, 2005), barium sulfate (BaSO 4 ) (Wang et al, in press) or iodinated (Parkesh et al, 2006(Parkesh et al, , 2007 contrast agents. In particular, BaSO 4 was proposed as a more benign alternative to lead-based stains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of Raman spectroscopy include its applicability to fresh tissue [24,74] and higher spatial resolution (with sampling volumes of 1 lm 3 or less) [25]. Raman spectroscopy can also be used with fixed and embedded specimens [32,80] and also to fluorescently labeled and stained specimens [21,52,75], although heavy staining may facilitate burning [50]. When combined with mechanical loading regimes, Raman spectroscopy correlates chemical information with bone failure responses at the ultrastructural level [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also worked with Thorri Gunnlaugsson [35,36] and his group of chemists to develop a delayed-action fluorescent dye, so that the crack still shines even after the background bone has gone dull, which makes histological detection much easier and, potentially, machine readable. We looked at the damaged crystal lattice of the crack walls and developed an iodine-based agent which could chelate to calcium and be visible using non-invasive microCT [37].…”
Section: Microdamagementioning
confidence: 99%