2006
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.040873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological processing variability in the determination of lateral resection margins in rectal cancer

Abstract: These results suggest that the fixation period/laboratory processes result in measurable differences in the reported LRM. This degree of variation has implications for the reliable reporting of the LRM, predicting local recurrence rates and planning subsequent adjuvant radiotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this study included the results from every department of pathology at a national level, encompassing all of the variations in standards of examination that are likely to be present in most countries, and thus minimizing the probability of selection bias. Although tissue shrinkage from formalin fixation in general may have reached 10–30% [11,28], when the DRM is short, the effect of shrinkage is negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this study included the results from every department of pathology at a national level, encompassing all of the variations in standards of examination that are likely to be present in most countries, and thus minimizing the probability of selection bias. Although tissue shrinkage from formalin fixation in general may have reached 10–30% [11,28], when the DRM is short, the effect of shrinkage is negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formalin fixation of surgical specimen has been described in various types of tumors as being responsible for shrinkage of tumor specimen and its tumor-free margins. The various tumors that have been studied include colorectal, esophageal, skin, and, more recently, breast tumors [ 15 , 16 , 27 , 28 ]. The comparison of preformalin fixation macroscopic margin and postformalin fixation microscopic margin in principle may not seem compatible; however, it is the most convenient and practical way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison of preformalin fixation macroscopic margin and postformalin fixation microscopic margin in principle may not seem compatible; however, it is the most convenient and practical way. This method has already been described in assessing esophageal and colorectal as well as breast tumors in the past [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formalin-associated shrinkage is the second and more significant component of specimen shrinkage. Fixation in formalin can result in shrinkage or contraction of the tissue by up to 33%, increasing with time and occurring in both the longitudinal and the circumferential planes 3 5. One effect of formalin is dehydration 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixation in formalin can result in shrinkage or contraction of the tissue by up to 33%, increasing with time and occurring in both the longitudinal and the circumferential planes 3 5. One effect of formalin is dehydration 5. Formalin stabilises cellular structure by crosslinking proteins, glycoproteins, nucleic acids and polysaccharides, particularly at sites of primary amines such as lysine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%