2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological criteria for the identification of acute cellular rejection in human small bowel allografts: results of the pathology workshop at the VIII International Small Bowel Transplant Symposium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tx patient data are summarized in Table 1a. Histological evaluations of biopsy specimens were conducted by trained pathologists using the classical rejection grading system (22). The second group (non-Tx group) included samples obtained from 10 non-Tx patients (two children and eight adults) undergoing other abdominal surgical procedures from which a distal ileum segment was obtained and used as healthy control group (Table 1b).…”
Section: Patients and Study Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tx patient data are summarized in Table 1a. Histological evaluations of biopsy specimens were conducted by trained pathologists using the classical rejection grading system (22). The second group (non-Tx group) included samples obtained from 10 non-Tx patients (two children and eight adults) undergoing other abdominal surgical procedures from which a distal ileum segment was obtained and used as healthy control group (Table 1b).…”
Section: Patients and Study Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histopathological assessments were performed with special concern to ACR in each graft. In analysis regarding to ACR, these rejection grades were evaluated based on our previously established grading schema in SBT (13,14). None of the chosen biopsies had morphological or clinical evidence of concomitant infection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease or other complications.…”
Section: Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endoscopic findings of acute rejection include blunted and short villi, edematous and friable mucosa, superficial or deep ulcers, and diffuse mucosal exfoliation; these findings can be mimicked by infection. The histopathological features of acute cellular rejection include a mixed but mostly mononuclear infiltrate with activated lymphocytes, villus blunting and crypt epithelial cell apoptosis [45]. The rejection is graded as indeterminate, mild, moderate or severe depending upon the extent of the mucosal injury and the degree of inflammatory infiltrate and apoptosis.…”
Section: Graft Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%