2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological age assessment in a prehispanic Maya sample from Xcambó, Yucatan, Mexico: Benefits and limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain age‐estimation methods that incorporate cortical area or cortical width provide sex‐specific equations (Crowder & Dominguez, 2012; Kimura, 1992; Narasaki, 1990; Thompson, 1979), but others do not (Botha et al, 2018; Cho et al, 2002; Han et al, 2009; Lee et al, 2014; Stout et al, 1996; Stout & Paine, 1992). Methods that do not find sex differences tend to have developmental sample populations that are skewed toward males (Table 2), and trends specific to females may be overlooked (Gocha, 2019; Suzuki & Maggiano, 2018).…”
Section: Histomorphometric Variability and Age‐at‐death Estimation Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain age‐estimation methods that incorporate cortical area or cortical width provide sex‐specific equations (Crowder & Dominguez, 2012; Kimura, 1992; Narasaki, 1990; Thompson, 1979), but others do not (Botha et al, 2018; Cho et al, 2002; Han et al, 2009; Lee et al, 2014; Stout et al, 1996; Stout & Paine, 1992). Methods that do not find sex differences tend to have developmental sample populations that are skewed toward males (Table 2), and trends specific to females may be overlooked (Gocha, 2019; Suzuki & Maggiano, 2018).…”
Section: Histomorphometric Variability and Age‐at‐death Estimation Acmentioning
confidence: 99%