2023
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic re‑evaluation of a population‑based series of renal cell carcinomas from The Netherlands Cohort Study according to the 2022 ISUP/WHO classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Odeh et al, re-evaluated renal cell carcinoma according to the 2022 WHO classification in a large cohort of 457 cases and found no discrepancy with the previous diagnoses ( 9 ). A recent study showed that two thirds of tumours which were “unclassifiable eosinophilic RCC” were reclassified based on the newer immunohistochemical markers and contributed to the prognostic outcomes ( 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Odeh et al, re-evaluated renal cell carcinoma according to the 2022 WHO classification in a large cohort of 457 cases and found no discrepancy with the previous diagnoses ( 9 ). A recent study showed that two thirds of tumours which were “unclassifiable eosinophilic RCC” were reclassified based on the newer immunohistochemical markers and contributed to the prognostic outcomes ( 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To explore the impact of contrast enhanced CTs on our results, we first performed a sensitivity analysis where we excluded patients whose CTs contained contrast ( n = 217, 17%); next we tested whether associations between body composition and pathological tumour features differed by contrast using effect measure modification, and finally, present multivariable models adjusted for contrast. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the potential impact of the tumour grade classification change by performing a probabilistic sensitivity analysis following methods for outcome misclassification 27 based on the concordance between Fuhrman and ISUP grade reported by Odeh et al 28 For methodological details, see supporting information. All statistical tests used a significance level of 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%