1978
DOI: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1978.tb00433.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic Malignancy Grading in Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva

Abstract: A preliminary report on a histologic malignancy grading of vulvar carcinoma is presented. A retrospective histologic study of 40 vulvar carcinoma cases stage I and II (TNM-system) with a minimum five-year follow-up was carried out and correlated to the course of the disease. Morphologic criteria characterizing the tumor cell population, as well as the tumor-host relationship, were examined and scored. The scores obtained could be divided into three groups that correlated well with the clinical outcome. The low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the current study, all slides of tumors were reviewed by an experienced gynecopathologist (H.H.). The tumors were reexamined for: greatest tumor dimension (mm), depth of invasion (with a calibrated micrometer, depth of invasion was measured in mm from the stratum granulosum to the deepest point of the tumor), degree of differentiation (good, moderate, or poor; when the percentage of undifferentiated cells was < 5%, the tumor was scored as well differentiated; tumors with 5–50% undifferentiated cells were scored moderately differentiated; and tumors with > 50% undifferentiated cells were scored poorly differentiated),25 and the presence of lymph/vascular invasion (defined as the presence of tumor emboli in endothelial‐lined spaces). In Group I, only sections of the margins from the specimen were taken to exclude tumor in these margins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the current study, all slides of tumors were reviewed by an experienced gynecopathologist (H.H.). The tumors were reexamined for: greatest tumor dimension (mm), depth of invasion (with a calibrated micrometer, depth of invasion was measured in mm from the stratum granulosum to the deepest point of the tumor), degree of differentiation (good, moderate, or poor; when the percentage of undifferentiated cells was < 5%, the tumor was scored as well differentiated; tumors with 5–50% undifferentiated cells were scored moderately differentiated; and tumors with > 50% undifferentiated cells were scored poorly differentiated),25 and the presence of lymph/vascular invasion (defined as the presence of tumor emboli in endothelial‐lined spaces). In Group I, only sections of the margins from the specimen were taken to exclude tumor in these margins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tumors were reexamined for: greatest tumor dimension (mm), depth of invasion (with a calibrated micrometer, depth of invasion was measured in mm from the stratum granulosum to the deepest point of the tumor), degree of differentiation (good, moderate, or poor; when the percentage of undifferentiated cells was Ͻ 5%, the tumor was scored as well differentiated; tumors with 5-50% undifferentiated cells were scored moderately differentiated; and tumors with Ͼ 50% undifferentiated cells were scored poorly differentiated), 25 and the presence of lymph/vascular invasion (defined as the presence of tumor emboli in endothelial-lined spaces). In Group I, only sections of the margins from the specimen were taken to exclude tumor in these margins.…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 77 patients the prognoses were estimated from properties of the tumour cell population: structure, differentiation into cell type, nuclear polymorphism, mitosis, and the tumour host relationship: mode of invasion, stage of invasion, vascular invasion, (lymphotic) cellular response, were graded according to a pointscore system used for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (13, 14), the palate (8), the gingiva (28), the uterine cervix (25) and the vulva (15). Each parameter was given 1 to 3 points resulting in a total of 8 to 24 points in an increasing grade of malignancy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%