2011
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic grading of the extent of residual carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Background Several grading schemes for the extent of residual tumor in post-treatment pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) specimens have been proposed. However, the prognostic significance of these grading schemes is unknown. Methods Histopathologic slides of 223 cases who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and PD were reviewed. The extent of residual tumor was graded using both the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the Evans grading systems. The grading results were correlated with clinicopathological pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
219
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
219
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed distinct CT signatures in patients who had complete pathological responses compared with those with poor responses to therapy ( Figure 4A), and the normalized CT-derived parameter AUC directly correlated with pathological response (Spearman rank-order correlation, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.05; P = 0.02; Figure 4B). As previously observed by our group (18,21), patients with better grades of pathological responses (i.e., fewer viable cells after therapy) had improved prognosis, and as response correlated directly with normalized AUC, patients with higher normalized AUC values also had improved prognosis (Supplemental Table 8). Multivariate analysis of the 80 patients who underwent resection confirmed that normalized AUC was an independent predictor of overall survival (Table 2).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We observed distinct CT signatures in patients who had complete pathological responses compared with those with poor responses to therapy ( Figure 4A), and the normalized CT-derived parameter AUC directly correlated with pathological response (Spearman rank-order correlation, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.05; P = 0.02; Figure 4B). As previously observed by our group (18,21), patients with better grades of pathological responses (i.e., fewer viable cells after therapy) had improved prognosis, and as response correlated directly with normalized AUC, patients with higher normalized AUC values also had improved prognosis (Supplemental Table 8). Multivariate analysis of the 80 patients who underwent resection confirmed that normalized AUC was an independent predictor of overall survival (Table 2).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In malignancies such as rectal, esophageal and breast cancer, pCR has been associated with improved disease-free survival and OS (73)(74)(75)(76)(77)(78)(79)(80)(81)(82)(83). In PAC, a number of studies reported pathologic outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without fractionated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy, and the pCR rate ranges between 2.4 and 32.0% (41,(84)(85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94). Two of these studies reported a significantly improved OS for patients who achieved pCR compared with that of patients who did not (88,89), although this finding was not confirmed by a different study (90).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PAC, a number of studies reported pathologic outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without fractionated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy, and the pCR rate ranges between 2.4 and 32.0% (41,(84)(85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94). Two of these studies reported a significantly improved OS for patients who achieved pCR compared with that of patients who did not (88,89), although this finding was not confirmed by a different study (90). In the aforementioned studies involving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, no specific survival data were reported in patients who achieved pCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary endpoint was pathologic response according to the grading system developed by Evans et al [19]. This system has been utilized in prior studies and is shown to correlate with patient outcome [19,26]. Larger studies will be required to determine if dMRI is useful as a prognostic marker for early treatment response stratification of patients with pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%