1993
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910540206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic grading in soft‐tissue sarcomas. An analysis of 194 cases including agnor count and mast‐cell count

Abstract: In order to establish a new histologic grading system for STS, we evaluated histologic prognostic factors. For this purpose, we selected 194 patients with STS: 31 in the upper extremities, 63 in the trunk, and 100 in lower extremities. All the patients were treated by surgery, followed by chemotherapy in 74 cases, radiotherapy in 11, chemotherapy and radiotherapy in 30, or no adjuvant treatment in 79. Histologic factors evaluated were mitotic count, extent of necrosis, cellularity, cellular pleomorphism, exten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumor necrosis has repeatedly been established as a negative prognostic factor in STS. 23,[30][31][32][33][34] It also represents an important factor in the FNCLCC and the NCI grading systems, which apply cutoff values of 15% (microscopic evaluation) and 50% (macroscopic evaluation), respectively. 35 In the SING model, necrosis is classified as present or absent based on histological examination, irrespective of the size of the tumor area, which is perceived as advantageous in relation to the risk of sampling bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor necrosis has repeatedly been established as a negative prognostic factor in STS. 23,[30][31][32][33][34] It also represents an important factor in the FNCLCC and the NCI grading systems, which apply cutoff values of 15% (microscopic evaluation) and 50% (macroscopic evaluation), respectively. 35 In the SING model, necrosis is classified as present or absent based on histological examination, irrespective of the size of the tumor area, which is perceived as advantageous in relation to the risk of sampling bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the prognosis of patients with STSs has improved, a subset of STSs shows an aggressive clinical course and results in tumorrelated mortality (1,2). Therefore, a number of studies have been designed to investigate the prognostic factors of STSs, such as Ki-67, p53, cyclin D1, EGFR, cyclin A, CD40, CD44, VEGF, EZH2, FOXO1, c-Myc, osteopontin, Bcl-2, ERBB2, KIT, IGF-1R and MCM2, since they may aid in determining the course of adjuvant therapy and the length of follow-up ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STSs often display highly aggressive behavior with a tendency towards early metastasis. Although the same histological categories of STSs exist, various grades of malignancy with different prognosis are included (2). A variety of clinicopathological factors, such as tumor size, depth and histological grade, have been studied to predict the malignant potential of STSs (1)(2)(3)(4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histologic grade was determined by cellularity, extent of necrosis and number of mitoses. 6,7 Two patients were in stage I, 7 in stage II and 37 in stage III. Clinical staging was determined based on the revised recommendations of the American Joint Committee on Cancer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%