2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1060-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic diagnosis in young women with breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When setting Luminal A as a baseline, the HR value of triple-negative subtype (HR = 2.90) remains larger than that of Luminal B (HR = 2.23) or Her-2 subtypes (HR = 2.26) for overall recurrence (Table  4). Previous studies have shown that triple-negative receptor status is strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes [56], and that young women more frequently suffer from triple-negative tumors [57]. Thus, triple-negative subtype should be considered the biggest risk factor for recurrence and adjuvant CT should be administered in BCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When setting Luminal A as a baseline, the HR value of triple-negative subtype (HR = 2.90) remains larger than that of Luminal B (HR = 2.23) or Her-2 subtypes (HR = 2.26) for overall recurrence (Table  4). Previous studies have shown that triple-negative receptor status is strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes [56], and that young women more frequently suffer from triple-negative tumors [57]. Thus, triple-negative subtype should be considered the biggest risk factor for recurrence and adjuvant CT should be administered in BCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triple negative receptor status is strongly associated with poor clinical outcome [19,20]. In general, young women have more frequently triple negative tumours [19,21]. This could therefore be the biological explanation for worse outcome related to young age [7][8][9][10]13,16].…”
Section: Mcdonald Et Al Recently Reported On a Series Of 282 Invasivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este subtipo, al igual que el subtipo basaloide, se ha descrito como asociado a un mal pronóstico [25]. Minoritariamente, un 5,56% (n=4) de los Epidemiológicamente, la prevalencia de los subtipos inmunohistoquímicos en pacientes jóvenes varía entre estudios [28]. Resulta interesante comparar que en un estudio realizado por Ihemelandu, C. et al en el cual se evaluó un grupo de mujeres menores de 50 años, el porcentaje de pacientes que presentó un carcinoma de tipo Luminal A fue de 50%; mientras que 21% expresaba el subtipo basal-like [29].…”
Section: Subtipo Inmunohistoquímicounclassified