2022
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histogram Analysis Based on Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density MR Imaging for Differentiation Between Glioblastoma Multiforme and Solitary Brain Metastasis and Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Two ROI Placements

Abstract: BackgroundPreoperative differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and solitary brain metastasis (SBM) contributes to guide neurosurgical decision‐making.PurposeTo explore the value of histogram analysis based on neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) in differentiating between GBM and SBM and comparison of the diagnostic performance of two region of interest (ROI) placements.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationIn all, 109 patients with GBM (n = 57) or SBM (n = 52) were enrolled.Field St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advanced diffusion models describe the displacement of the water molecules more accurately, which can illustrate the microstructural information of the tissue better. Several non-Gaussian diffusion models have been used to evaluate glioma, and they performed well in predicting glioma genotyping ( Gao et al, 2022 ) and distinguishing glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis ( Qi et al, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2022 ). In this study, we evaluated the performance of 4 diffusion models in differentiating glioma with atypical MRI manifestation from brain inflammation, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced diffusion models describe the displacement of the water molecules more accurately, which can illustrate the microstructural information of the tissue better. Several non-Gaussian diffusion models have been used to evaluate glioma, and they performed well in predicting glioma genotyping ( Gao et al, 2022 ) and distinguishing glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis ( Qi et al, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2022 ). In this study, we evaluated the performance of 4 diffusion models in differentiating glioma with atypical MRI manifestation from brain inflammation, including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator (MAP), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, VEC, calculated through the ISOVF and ICVF, can be replaced by the ODI. Another study assessed the NODDI histogram analysis for distinguishing between two tumor types and compared the diagnostic performance of placing regions of interest (ROIs) [18]. Traditional diffusion data analysis methods involve pixel/voxel comparisons to identify lesion differences or rely on the mean signal for ROI-based investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomics can acquire quantitative imaging signatures at a high throughput and correlate imaging signatures with targeted clinical outcomes [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. ROIs and volumes of interest (VOIs) are delineated on the subregions of tumors and lesions [18,26,27]. Thus, radiomics offers diverse imaging information and helps to explore the tumor microenvironment by analyzing well-defined subregional features that more precisely describe tumor heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of JMRI, an article by Qi et al 6 extends the application of NODDI to the same clinical scenario, using a larger sample size of 109 patients, 57 with GBM and 52 with SBM, all pathologically confirmed. This well‐designed study uses histogram analysis of the enhancing tumor and the peri‐tumoral edema zone separately.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%