1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01005063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histochemical properties of the biventer cervicis muscle of the chick: a relationship between multiple innervation and slow-tonic fibre types

Abstract: Chick biventer cervicis muscle fibres have been studied histochemically. Fast-twitch, focally innervated (alpha) fibres represent 70-80% of the total fibres in this muscles. Two histochemical profiles of slow-tonic multi-innervated (beta) fibres have been observed from embryonic life the adult (three-months) stage. These two slow-tonic types differ in the activity of their histochemically demonstrated myofibrillar ATPase after either acid or alkaline preincubation, and after formalin fixation. Both slow-tonic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in sensitivity of the chick biventer cervicis and mouse diaphragm preparations to M. laticollaris venom is a fact. The explanation must rely not only the species selectivity of animal toxins [30,31], but also on the anatomical differences between mouse diaphragm (single innervated fiber, en plaque endings) and chick biventer end-plates (multiple innervated fiber, en grape endings) [32]. Furthermore, the existence of two populations of nicotinic receptors in BC preparations is well-known [33,34], i.e ., one population that is extrajunctional and responds well to exogenous Ach, but is rapidly blocked by venom neurotoxins, and another located in the motor end-plate that responds to nerve stimulation and is less susceptible to rapid blockade by neurotoxins (possibly because of difficulties related to toxin diffusion into the synaptic cleft).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in sensitivity of the chick biventer cervicis and mouse diaphragm preparations to M. laticollaris venom is a fact. The explanation must rely not only the species selectivity of animal toxins [30,31], but also on the anatomical differences between mouse diaphragm (single innervated fiber, en plaque endings) and chick biventer end-plates (multiple innervated fiber, en grape endings) [32]. Furthermore, the existence of two populations of nicotinic receptors in BC preparations is well-known [33,34], i.e ., one population that is extrajunctional and responds well to exogenous Ach, but is rapidly blocked by venom neurotoxins, and another located in the motor end-plate that responds to nerve stimulation and is less susceptible to rapid blockade by neurotoxins (possibly because of difficulties related to toxin diffusion into the synaptic cleft).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such increases in the intensity of staining of myosin ATPase after preincubation at pH 10.4-11.0 have been shown in avian pectoralis, gastrocnemius (22) and biventer cervicis muscles (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the two myofiber types the reaction for myosin ATPase remains unchanged after acid or alkaline preincubation. Two types of tonic myofibers have been recently reported to exist in the biventer cervicis muscle of the chick (23). These indicate that the staining profile for myosin ATPase varies among slow tonic myofbers and that the pH sensitivity of myosin ATPase in the tonic myofibers differs from that of mammalian type I and II myofibers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are found only as a minority constituent of some fast-twitch (type II) muscles and are innervated at distributed synaptic sites (Ashmore et al, 1978;Toutant et al, 1981;Barnard et al, 1982) by terminals variously described as "en grappe' (Hess, 1961(Hess, , 1970 or small 'en plaque' endings (Barnard et al, 1982). Muscles that consist of heterogeneous mixtures of fast (type II) and slow (type I) fibres have been shown to arise during embryogenesis independently of the nerves (Butler et al, 1982;Phillips & Bennett, 1984;Phillips et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%