2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6843-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histamine H2 Receptor Biased Signaling Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 140 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key advantage of such agonistic G protein-biased ligands is that they are unlikely to be internalized due to their low β-arrestin2 recruitment and therefore can also be applied to cells without taking any measures against internalization (e.g., hypotonic buffer). 36 The obtained pEC 50 values were in good agreement with the K i values from the radioligand competition-binding assays, especially in the case of the mini-G protein recruitment assay (Table 2). In the mini-G protein recruitment assay at the gpH 2 R, 20−25 were strong partial agonists with slightly increased potencies.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A key advantage of such agonistic G protein-biased ligands is that they are unlikely to be internalized due to their low β-arrestin2 recruitment and therefore can also be applied to cells without taking any measures against internalization (e.g., hypotonic buffer). 36 The obtained pEC 50 values were in good agreement with the K i values from the radioligand competition-binding assays, especially in the case of the mini-G protein recruitment assay (Table 2). In the mini-G protein recruitment assay at the gpH 2 R, 20−25 were strong partial agonists with slightly increased potencies.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%