1944
DOI: 10.1515/bchm2.1944.280.1-2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histaminausscheidung nach Belastung mit Histidin

Abstract: In kürzlich verö^ffentKchtenJPntersuchungen 2 ) an mehreren Tierarten und in einer größeren Anzahl von Versuchen am Menschen haben wir gezeigt, daß enteral und parenteral zugeführtes l -Dioxyphenylalanin zu einem beträchtlichen Teil zu Oxytyramin decarboxyliert wird und als solches im Hai n erseheint. Das gressorisch wirkende Amin wurde besonders iii den Versuchen am Menschen häufig überwiegend in gebundener/ pharmakologisch unwirksamer Form -r-vermutlich mit Schwefelsäure ödet GA^-curonsäure gepaart -r* ausge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1945
1945
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that in the rat aminoguanidine does not significantly increase the amount of 14C-histamine in the urine following injection of '4C-histidine, which is taken to indicate that this histamine was not exposed to histaminase, which again suggests formation of histamine in the kidney followed by immediate excretion (Schayer et al 1954). This is in agreement with the original observations by Holtz & Credner (1944) who injected histidine in guinea-pigs and found an increased excretion of histamine in the urine. In pregnancy the possibility of histamine formation in the kidney deserves consideration on account of the increased urinary excretion of histidine during pregnancy (for references see Christensen, Date, Sch0nheyder & Volqvartz, 1957).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It has been reported that in the rat aminoguanidine does not significantly increase the amount of 14C-histamine in the urine following injection of '4C-histidine, which is taken to indicate that this histamine was not exposed to histaminase, which again suggests formation of histamine in the kidney followed by immediate excretion (Schayer et al 1954). This is in agreement with the original observations by Holtz & Credner (1944) who injected histidine in guinea-pigs and found an increased excretion of histamine in the urine. In pregnancy the possibility of histamine formation in the kidney deserves consideration on account of the increased urinary excretion of histidine during pregnancy (for references see Christensen, Date, Sch0nheyder & Volqvartz, 1957).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The kidneys are rich in L-histidine decarboxylase and have been suggested as a site of histamine formation after L-histidine loading (6,13). In this connection mention must be made of the fact that no untoward effects whatever were noted by the healthy individuals after loading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%