2006
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2006.880374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HiSIM2: Advanced MOSFET Model Valid for RF Circuit Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models excelled in accuracy through many generations Manuscript of technology from 350 to 28 nm [2]. While BSIM3 and BSIM4 are threshold-based models, there also exist different class of models based on surface potential approach [3], [4] and charge-based approach [5]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models excelled in accuracy through many generations Manuscript of technology from 350 to 28 nm [2]. While BSIM3 and BSIM4 are threshold-based models, there also exist different class of models based on surface potential approach [3], [4] and charge-based approach [5]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed model iteratively solves the surface potential at source and drain side after the HiSIM (Hiroshima University STARC IGFET Model) approach [16][17][18]. The model first calculates 0 s φ at the source region end adjacent to the gate electrode in the organic semiconductor layer, then 0 b φ at the backside of the source region end, after that sL φ at the drain region end adjacent to the gate electrode in the organic semiconductor layer, and finally bL φ at the backside of the drain region end.…”
Section: Surface Potential Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model I needs to be able to predict accurately characteristics variations for process condition changes. For example, HiSIM2 [1] or the compact model proposed by Sakamoto, et al [2] is qualified for Model I. These compact models have a good predictability of characteristics variations due to process condition change because the models are more physics-oriented than a certain class of compact model (such as a vth-based one) and their major model parameters correspond more directly to device technology such as channel doping profile.…”
Section: A Constructing New Accuracy Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%