2020
DOI: 10.15420/aer.2020.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

His–Purkinje Conduction System Pacing: State of the Art in 2020

Abstract: Conduction system pacing involves directly stimulating the specialised His–Purkinje cardiac conduction system with the aim of activating the ventricles physiologically, in contrast to the dyssynchronous activation produced by conventional myocardial pacing. Since the first report of permanent His bundle pacing (HBP) in 2000, the stylet-driven technique of its earliest incarnation has been superseded by a more successful stylet-less approach. Widespread uptake has led to a much greater evidence base. Single-cen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S-HBP and NS-HBP were defined according to internationally recognized criteria (set out in the Online Appendix). 1 , 2 , 3 Patients with various indications for HBP were recruited: resynchronization of bundle branch block (BBB), optimization of atrioventricular interval in heart failure, or prevention of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in atrioventricular block. All patients gave written, informed consent and the study was approved by the local ethics committee (13/LO/1440).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S-HBP and NS-HBP were defined according to internationally recognized criteria (set out in the Online Appendix). 1 , 2 , 3 Patients with various indications for HBP were recruited: resynchronization of bundle branch block (BBB), optimization of atrioventricular interval in heart failure, or prevention of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in atrioventricular block. All patients gave written, informed consent and the study was approved by the local ethics committee (13/LO/1440).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LBBAP and HBP restore physiological activation through the native conduction system, and LBBAP may be more feasible than HBP due to a wider target area. [ 5 , 36 ] Although HBP has been shown to lead to narrowing of the QRS duration and cardiac resynchronisation in clinical and simulation studies, implantation can be difficult and the success rates vary from 56% to 95%. [ 37 40 ] Follow-up can be problematic due to oversensing of atrial signals, undersensing of ventricular signals, lead displacement, and rising capture thresholds with premature battery depletion.…”
Section: Physiological Pacing and Lbbapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 43 ] Currently, LBBAP is usually delivered using a SelectSecure 3830 pacing lead (Medtronic), and confirmation is dependent on several criteria, which are currently being updated and validated. [ 5 , 36 , 44 ] The predominant complications of LBBAP relate to the risk of septal perforations and lead dislodgements. LBBAP may be affected by intrinsic conduction and programming optimal atrioventricular delays will be important.…”
Section: Physiological Pacing and Lbbapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conduction system pacing (CSP) is gaining widespread adoption as an alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing and – in some instances – as an alternative to biventricular pacing for CRT. [ 1 ] Whereas tools are evolving to facilitate implantation, there are currently no generators specifically designed to facilitate programming of CSP. Proper device programming is essential to ensure patient safety and obtain the greatest benefit from pacing therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%