His, hers, or ours? Work-to-family spillover, crossover, and family cohesion

Stevens, Daphne Pedersen; Kiger, Gary; Riley, Pamela J.

doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2006.04.011

Cited by 53 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, we use a large, nationally representative survey of working Canadians, and limit our analyses to individuals whose crossover stress from spouses is arguably most potent, including those in dual-earner households with at least one child. By contrast, prior studies on crossover stress rely on small samples of individuals, often in specific occupations, which limit generalizability and analyses across subgroups Matthews et al 2006;Stevens et al 2006). …”

Section: Current Contributions and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, studies on SPWFC find evidence ofdocument crossover stress for work, family, and health outcomes (Hammer et al 2005;Stevens et al 2006). …”

Section: Formatted: Bullets and Numberingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although most previous research has neglected to emphasize the role of secondary family stressors for crossover stress and mental health, some limited evidence supports these ideas (Hammer et al 2005;Matthews et al 2006;Stevens et al 2006). For example, Westman's (2001) Commented [SS2]: In several places we say "for similar arguments".…”

Section: Applying the Stress Process Model To Explain The Impact Of Cmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Spouse’s Work-to-family Conflict, Family Stressors, and Mental Health among Dual-earner Mothers and Fathers

Young

Schieman

Milkie

2013

Society and Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Always cite the published version, so the author(s) will receive recognition through services that track citation counts, e.g. Scopus. If you need to cite the page number of the TSpace version (original manuscript or accepted manuscript) because you cannot access the published version, then cite the TSpace version in addition to the published version using the permanent URI (handle) found on the record page. ABSTRACTWe examine the association between perceptions of spouse's work-to-family conflict, family stressors, and mental health outcomes using cross-sectional data from a sample of 1,348 dual-earning parents from a 2011 nationally representative survey of Canadian workers. Based on crossover stress theory and the Stress Process Model, we hypothesize that perceptions of spouse's work-to-family conflict are associated with family stressors, which in turn mediate the association between perceptions of spouse's work-to-family conflict and individuals' mental health. Using ordinary least square regression techniques, we find that perceptions of spouse's work-to-family conflict are associated with mental health outcomes, as well as secondary family stressors.Furthermore, the family stressors resulting from perceptions of spouse's work-to-family conflict facilitate family-to-work conflict among respondents, which further explains the association between perceptions of spouse's work-to-family conflict and mental health outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings for theories of crossover stress and the Stress Process Model.

show abstract

Section: Current Contributions and Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, studies on SPWFC find evidence ofdocument crossover stress for work, family, and health outcomes (Hammer et al 2005;Stevens et al 2006). …”

Section: Formatted: Bullets and Numberingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Applying the Stress Process Model To Explain The Impact Of Cmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Spouse’s Work-to-family Conflict, Family Stressors, and Mental Health among Dual-earner Mothers and Fathers

Young

Schieman

Milkie

2013

Society and Mental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As the literature review has highlighted, the genders are affected differently due to their different positions in the labor market, organizational positions and family responsibilities (which still appear to be significantly unbalanced). Since family responsibilities are still mainly considered the domain of women, as primary caretakers (Triana, 2011), studies also show that women are more affected by spillover effects (Stevens et al 2006;Offer, 2014;Keene, 2005). Moreover, it is highly interesting that similar spillover effects can affect men and women differently.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spillover: the empirical utilisation of the concept. An empirical review of the social scientific corpus between 2004-2014

Király

Nagy

Géring

et al. 2015

CJSSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent decades, spillover has become a highly influential concept which has led to the initiation of new theoretical and methodological approaches that are designed to understand how people attempt to reconcile their work and private lives. The very notion of spillover presupposes that these spheres are connected, since the people who move between them bring certain 'less visible' content with them such as cognitive or affective mental constructs, skills, behaviors, etc. This paper attempts to create fresh insight into the different areas, themes and methodologies related to how spillover has been addressed over the last ten years. Four main categories are discussed based on the 76 academic articles that were selected: (1) general spillover research, (2) job flexibility and spillover, (3) individual coping strategies, and (4) the spillover effect on the different genders. The final section of the paper provides a tentative synthesis of the main conclusions and findings from the examined papers.Keywords spillover, work-life balance, flexibility, gender differences, coping strategy, empirical review 1 Gábor Király (corresponding author) is associate professor at the Budapest Business School and senior lecturer at the Corvinus University of Budapest, e-mail: kiraly.gabor@pszfb.bgf. hu, gabor.kiraly@uni-corvinus.hu, Beáta Nagy is professor at the Corvinus University of Budapest, Zsuzsanna Géring is research fellow at the Budapest Business School, Márta Radó is Ph.D. student, Yvette Lovas and Bence Pálóczi are undergraduate students at the Corvinus University of Budapest. This review was prepared as part of a Hungarian Scientific Research Fund project (OTKA K104707). The title of the project: Dilemmas and strategies in reconciling family and work. We would like to express our gratitude to Dávid Ádám who contributed to building the database we utilised in this review. Moreover, special thanks to our fellow members in the 'OTKA' research group for the dedication and energy they provided and keep doing so throughout the project. Last but not least, the authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable comments and remarks on the previous versions of this paper. Responsibility for any errors in the resulting work remains our own. 94

show abstract

“…For women, work and its characteristics influence family cohesion, while in cultural aspect men have shown that are more likely to commit to work than to family (Daphne Pedersen Stevens, Gary Kiger, Pamela J. Riley, 2006). On the other hand the absence of gender differences in efficacy at work confirms that both genders are equally skilled to perform a particular job.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%