History, Commemoration and National Preoccupation 2007
DOI: 10.5871/bacad/9780197264065.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘His dirge our groans—his monument our praise’: Official and Popular Commemoration of Nelson in 1805–6

Abstract: This chapter asks what the heroification of Nelson immediately after his death entailed. What conflicting images were created, in text and visual media, perhaps continuing the ways in which Nelson himself had manipulated his image during his lifetime? Contrasting official with popular commemoration, and exploring their interaction, it presents a nuanced picture of ‘national’ commemorations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 As well, it is more than likely that during his time in England Richardson became aware of the statutes, paintings, and services that memorialized Britain's defeat of France in 1815. 11 Thus, in his desire to provide a narrative of the events of 1812-1813, Richardson participated in colonial, transatlantic, and imperial dialogues about the effects of the Na poleonic Wars, his participation mediated by a focus on the War's specific and local ef fect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 As well, it is more than likely that during his time in England Richardson became aware of the statutes, paintings, and services that memorialized Britain's defeat of France in 1815. 11 Thus, in his desire to provide a narrative of the events of 1812-1813, Richardson participated in colonial, transatlantic, and imperial dialogues about the effects of the Na poleonic Wars, his participation mediated by a focus on the War's specific and local ef fect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%