“…It is possible that degeneration process may be more pronounced in the threads of the accessory pathway than in the normal conduction system (Klein et al ., 1980) However, old age and long anterograde effective refractory period of the accessory pathway may also be characteristic of patients in whom the accessory pathway have gradually lost the anterograde conduction capacity with age because of their rapid atrioventricular conduction. In connection with the early disappearance and subsequent re‐emergence of preexcitation in the first two decades of life (Lunberg, 1973; Deal et al ., 1985; Perry & Garson, 1990; Sano et al ., 1998), and the combination with relatively long atrioventricular conduction time and block (Seipel et al ., 1976; Belokon & Barinova, 1984; Pfeiffer et al ., 1986; Mossuti et al ., 1990; Visman et al ., 1993; Sasaki et al ., 1995; Nabar et al ., 1998), it is suggested that the retention of the accessory pathway in the myocardium may be compensatory in nature in patients with delayed physiological or pathological atrioventricular conduction. Yet, they may precipitate dysrhythmias.…”