2018
DOI: 10.15420/aer.2018.6.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

His Bundle Pacing: A New Frontier in the Treatment of Heart Failure

Abstract: Biventricular pacing has revolutionised the treatment of heart failure in patients with sinus rhythm and left bundle branch block; however, left ventricular-lead placement is not always technically possible. Furthermore, biventricular pacing does not fully normalise ventricular activation and, therefore, the ventricular resynchronisation is imperfect. Right ventricular pacing for bradycardia may cause or worsen heart failure in some patients by causing dyssynchronous ventricular activation. His bundle pacing a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interest in direct PHBP has grown rapidly in recent years as an alternative to right ventricular or biventricular pacing for prevention of pacing‐induced cardiomyopathy as well as for cardiac resynchronization in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. The development of a dedicated pacing lead and sheaths for PHBP implantation has further enhanced feasibility for routine clinical use 1 . Several observational studies have demonstrated a reduction in adverse cardiovascular events with PHBP compared to right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation 2,3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest in direct PHBP has grown rapidly in recent years as an alternative to right ventricular or biventricular pacing for prevention of pacing‐induced cardiomyopathy as well as for cardiac resynchronization in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. The development of a dedicated pacing lead and sheaths for PHBP implantation has further enhanced feasibility for routine clinical use 1 . Several observational studies have demonstrated a reduction in adverse cardiovascular events with PHBP compared to right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation 2,3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right ventricular (RV) pacing has a long‐standing and well‐documented reputation for causing dyssynchronous activation of the ventricles, leading to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure . Multiple studies have attempted to determine whether sites different to the RV apex (such as the RV septum) show superior clinical outcomes, and reduce the risk of pacing‐induced ventricular dysfunction, but to date none have been able to show this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the lack of dedicated equipment available to permanently implant such leads, interest dropped, and it is only in the 21st century where the first article was published to support its cause . More recently, dedicated delivery sheaths and the discovery that the Select Secure 3830 active RV lead (Medtronic) with an active screw allows His bundle pacing to be delivered more successfully has caused interest to rapidly grow . Studies are underway to assess its potential to compete with biventricular pacing to improve heart failure symptoms while maintaining ventricular synchrony.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations