2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hips and hearts: The variation in incentive effects of insurance across hospital procedures

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent School of Economics, University of New South Wales AbstractThe separate identification of effects due to incentives, selection and preference heterogeneity in insurance markets is the topic of much debate. In this paper, we investigate the presence and variation in moral hazard across health care procedures. The key motivating hypothesis is the expectation of larger causal effects i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondary end points were the level of adherence with the eTG for the management of severe pyelonephritis/urosepsis and the appropriateness of gentamicin use in this sample population. Adherence to standard treatment guidelines was evaluated based on recommendations in the eTG 23 , where first line treatment is stated (for the complete study period) as gentamicin IV 4–6 mg/kg given as an immediate single dose with amoxicillin/ampicillin IV 2 g given every 6 hours [24,25]. For patients hypersensitive to penicillin, gentamicin alone can be used for initial therapy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondary end points were the level of adherence with the eTG for the management of severe pyelonephritis/urosepsis and the appropriateness of gentamicin use in this sample population. Adherence to standard treatment guidelines was evaluated based on recommendations in the eTG 23 , where first line treatment is stated (for the complete study period) as gentamicin IV 4–6 mg/kg given as an immediate single dose with amoxicillin/ampicillin IV 2 g given every 6 hours [24,25]. For patients hypersensitive to penicillin, gentamicin alone can be used for initial therapy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [21, 22]. In Australia, the Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic (electronic version) (eTG) [23], recommend gentamicin IV 4–6 mg/kg as a single dose with amoxicillin/ampicillin IV 2 g 6 hourly as first line empirical therapy in urosepsis [24, 25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we control for an extensive set of variables measuring objective and subjective health status and preference heterogeneity, we cannot fully rule out the possibility of biases resulting from omitted variables. To gauge how large the remaining biases in the estimated effects of marital status would be, we examine how sensitive the estimates are to the exclusions of observed controls, following the literature (Altonji, Elder, & Taber, 2005; Doiron, Fiebig, & Suziedelyte, 2014). Specifically, we delete a particular set of control variables from the specification with full sets of controls each time and re‐estimate these alternative specifications.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among studies of the latter, many consider the effects of PHI on hospital utilization, including Holly et al (1998), Harmon and Nolan (2001), Savage and Wright (2003), Doiron, Fiebig and Suziedelyte (2014) and Eldridge, Onur and Velamuri (2017). However, fewer consider moral hazard in extras treatments such as dental services, vision care or allied health services, not least in Australia.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%