2008
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hippocampal volumes and neuron numbers increase along a gradient of environmental harshness: a large-scale comparison

Abstract: Environmental conditions may provide specific demands for memory, which in turn may affect specific brain regions responsible for memory function. For food-caching animals, in particular, spatial memory appears to be important because it may have a direct effect on fitness via the accuracy of cache retrieval. Animals living in more harsh environments should rely more on cached food, and thus theoretically should have better memory to support cache retrieval, which may be crucial for survival. Consequently, ani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
199
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
22
199
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, after the brain tissue is extracted from the animal, it is generally post-fixed in a formalin solution for a period ranging from a day to several weeks (e.g. Pravosudov & Clayton 2002;LaDage et al 2009b;Roth & Pravosudov 2009). This is yet another very important point where considerable tissue shrinkage may occur (Quester & Schroder 1997 and references therein; T. C. Roth, L. D. LaDage & V. V. Pravosudov, unpublished data).…”
Section: Problems With the Compatibility Of Data Across Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, after the brain tissue is extracted from the animal, it is generally post-fixed in a formalin solution for a period ranging from a day to several weeks (e.g. Pravosudov & Clayton 2002;LaDage et al 2009b;Roth & Pravosudov 2009). This is yet another very important point where considerable tissue shrinkage may occur (Quester & Schroder 1997 and references therein; T. C. Roth, L. D. LaDage & V. V. Pravosudov, unpublished data).…”
Section: Problems With the Compatibility Of Data Across Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of hypotheses have been generated to explain how selection may have driven changes in brain size (Francis, 1995;Barton and Harvey, 2000; de Winter and Oxnard, 2001;Hutcheon et al, 2002; Byrne and Corp, 2004;Lefebvre et al, 2004;Marino, 2005;Sol et al, 2005;Lefebvre and Sol, 2008;Rehkämper et al, 2008;Sol et al, 2008; Chittka and Niven, 2009;Roth and Pravosudov, 2009). Most, if not all, of these hypotheses suggest that selection is acting on behavior [e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of year when most items are being stored, the HF of black-capped chickadees is larger (Smulders et al 1995), containing more cells and incorporating more newly generated neurons (Barnea & Nottebohm 1994) than at other times of the year (see also Roth et al 2010;Sherry & Hoshooley 2010). Similarly, populations of black-capped chickadees that hoard more food have a larger hippocampus with more neurons than populations that hoard less food Roth & Pravosudov 2009). These correlations should be treated with caution, however, as demand for high capacity may covary with a demand for high spatial resolution (although it may not; see below), such that it is difficult to assign the differences in neuroanatomy to one or the other of the two aspects of spatial memory (or indeed any other correlating variables).…”
Section: Using Ecology To Predict Specific Memory Adaptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%