“…The first is Holston's (; ) concept of insurgent citizenship, where the term ‘insurgent' is employed to emphasize ‘the opposition of spaces of citizenship to the modernist spaces that physically dominate so many cities today' and ‘an opposition to the modernist political project that absorbs citizenship into a plan of state building' (Holston, : 157). Holston's work—since carried forth by many researchers in different contexts (see, for example, Pieterse, ; Pine, ; Earle, ; Samaddar, ; Butcher and Frediani, )—inspired the second formulation of insurgency, namely, insurgent planning (Sandercock, ; ), which articulates the emergence of insurgent planning histories towards developing a postmodern utopian planning stream. Sandercock's work, which has been expanded by Friedmann (), Miraftab and Wills (), Miraftab () and Sweet and Chakars (), among others, articulates the emergence of insurgent planning histories to reconceptualize planning history using gender, race, class and other forms of difference as categories of analysis, towards imagining the future differently.…”