Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: Minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach

Jia, Jianbo; Ji, Ying; Liu, Xinxin; Lianghao, Wu; Yu, Baoqing; Ao, Rongguang

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.006

Cited by 24 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To further read the full text, we found a lack of required data in 9 pieces of literature and 3 pieces of literature included other irrelevant interventions. Finally, 6 articles [10][11][12][13][14][15]were selected. The PRISMA literature inclusion and exclusion process were shown in Fig.…”

Section: Literature Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on the available datum from 4 studies [10,11,14,15], we found signi cant heterogeneity (Chi² = 111.20, df = 3, I² = 97%, p < 0.00001). As was shown in Fig.…”

Section: Incision Lengthmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Concerning the body mass index, one of the study [15] was not mentioned. Regarding RCTs, there were a total of 3 studies [10,11,15] that were enrolled in this article. Due to the particularity of surgery, all of these three studies did not report the methods of binding to participants and/or operators.…”

Section: The Basic Characteristics and Quality Evaluation Of Includedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 studies [10][11][12][13][14][15] recorded intraoperative blood loss. Because of statistical heterogeneity (Chi² = 402.99, df = 5, I² = 99%, p < 0.00001), random effects models were applied.…”

Section: Intraoperative Blood Lossmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data extracted from 4 studies [10,11,13,14], including 326 participants, showed post-operative transfusion rate ( Fig. 8).…”

Section: Blood Transfusion Ratementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A systematic review and meta-analysis of SuperPATH approach in hip arthroplasty

Zhou

Chen

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To compare the clinical and radiographic results of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach and conventional approach by systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Based on a pre-published protocol (PROSPERO CRD42020177717), we systematically retrieved databases from Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Knowledge for relevant literatures from the earliest available date to May 30, 2020. No language restriction was applied. RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. The methodological qualities were assessed using the guidelines provided by the Cochrane Collaboration for Systematic Reviews. Two reviewers were independently extracted data from all eligible studies, including types of studies, participants, interventions, and outcomes. Randomized or fixed-effect models were used to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD), odds ratio (OR) for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.Results: 6 articles were included in the study and 526 patients were selected, which was including 233 cases in the SuperPATH groups, 279 cases in the conventional groups and 4 cases performed two surgeries in succession. The SuperPATH group demonstrated shorter incision length (WMD = - 7.87, 95 % CI - 10.05 to - 5.69, P < 0.00001), decreased blood transfusion rate (OR = 0.48, 95 % CI 0.25 to 0.89, P = 0.02), decreased visual analogue scale (VAS) (WMD = -0.40, 95 % CI - 0.72 to - 0.08, P = 0.03) and higher Harris hip score (HHS) (WMD = 1.98, 95 % CI 0.18 to 3.77, P = 0.0002) than those in the conventional group. However, there was no difference in VAS and HHS between the two groups half a year later. There was no significant difference in the acetabular abduction angle (WMD = - 1.32, P = 0.32) in either group. Conclusions: SuperPATH minimally invasive approach with its reduced tissue damage, quick postoperative recovery and early rehabilitation demonstrates the short-term advantages of hip arthroplasty. However, the evidence for SuperPATH technique was limited in the number of studies and short duration of follow-up, so long-term results still need further analysis.

show abstract

Section: Literature Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on the available datum from 4 studies [10,11,14,15], we found signi cant heterogeneity (Chi² = 111.20, df = 3, I² = 97%, p < 0.00001). As was shown in Fig.…”

Section: Incision Lengthmentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: The Basic Characteristics and Quality Evaluation Of Includedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Intraoperative Blood Lossmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data extracted from 4 studies [10,11,13,14], including 326 participants, showed post-operative transfusion rate ( Fig. 8).…”

Section: Blood Transfusion Ratementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A systematic review and meta-analysis of SuperPATH approach in hip arthroplasty

Zhou

Chen

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Barriers and facilitators of weight bearing after hip fracture surgery among older adults. A scoping review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

SuperPath approach is a recommendable option in frail patients with femoral neck fractures: a case–control study

Cecere

Cicco

Bruno

et al. 2021

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The treatment of intracapsular femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in the elderly is usually based on hip replacement, both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). Recently, several tissue-sparing approaches for hip arthroplasty had been described with promising results in terms of hospitalization length, blood loss and dislocation rate. The aim of the present study was to compare the blood loss and the transfusion rate in a cohort of patients with FNF treated using an HA through both the SuperPath (SP) and the traditional posterolateral (PL) approaches. Materials and methods We retrospectively collected data from patients affected by FNFs between January 2018 and February 2020. All patients with intracapsular FNF treated with a single HA implant (Profemur L, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., USA) via PL or SP approaches were included. Exclusion criteria were pathological fractures, polytrauma and preoperatively transfused patients. Results Thirty-five patients were included and analysed in the present study. 17 patients were classified in the SP group, and 18 in the PL one. The rate of antithrombotic therapy was higher in the SP group compared with the PL group [10 (58, 82%) vs 4 (22, 2%)]. While the two groups did not differ in terms of preoperative haemoglobin (Hb), 48 h postoperative Hb and Hb reduction, a significative difference was observed in terms of blood transfusion rate (1 SP vs 9 PL, p = 0.0072). Conclusions The SuperPath approach in patients with FNF under antithrombotic therapy assures lower transfusion rate, potentially reducing complication rates and improving patients' outcomes.

show abstract

Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: Minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach

Cited by 24 publications

References 20 publications

A systematic review and meta-analysis of SuperPATH approach in hip arthroplasty

A systematic review and meta-analysis of SuperPATH approach in hip arthroplasty

Barriers and facilitators of weight bearing after hip fracture surgery among older adults. A scoping review

SuperPath approach is a recommendable option in frail patients with femoral neck fractures: a case–control study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About