2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1440-2440(03)80010-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hip and shoulder internal rotation range of motion deficits in professional tennis players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…About one-quarter of the patients were discharged to home with, on average, 2 joint contractures severe enough to interfere with daily activities. 8,17,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26] Several previous reports have mentioned persistent functional deficits after immobility. 2,5,8,15,16,28,29 Joint contractures have been identified as a potentially important cause of such deficits, but their prevalence and risk factors have not been quantified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…About one-quarter of the patients were discharged to home with, on average, 2 joint contractures severe enough to interfere with daily activities. 8,17,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26] Several previous reports have mentioned persistent functional deficits after immobility. 2,5,8,15,16,28,29 Joint contractures have been identified as a potentially important cause of such deficits, but their prevalence and risk factors have not been quantified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] It also allowed us to quantify a potential dose-effect relation between exposure to the ICU and severity of limitation in the range of motion. In addition, we defined "functionally significant contracture" as more severe limitation in the range of motion, to an extent that has been established in the literature as causing functional limitation 8,17,19,21,26 (Table 1).…”
Section: -21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6,7 Several previous researchers have shown that shoulder ROM is modified as an adaptive response to tennis play, 5,8,9 resulting in greater glenohumeral ER ROM, lower glenohumeral IR ROM and lower total arc of motion (TAM) of the dominant shoulder compared to the non-dominant shoulder. [4][5][6][8][9][10] A glenohumeral IR deficit (GIRD) of the dominant shoulder compared to the non-dominant shoulder is considered a major risk factor for glenohumeral joint injury in overhead athletes as it causes imbalance in the soft tissues and could lead to shoulder instability 11,12 , resulting in subacromial impingement syndromes and labral tears. 13 However, few studies have analyzed the relationship of asymmetries in shoulder rotation ROM and the shoulder pain history in tennis players, and these have shown different results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in ROM have been attributed to shortening of the posterior shoulder musculature and tightening of the posterior capsule secondary to microtrauma and consequent scar formation associated with the demand placed on these structures. 26 Overhead athletes who commence intensive training in the prepubertal years have also been ob-served to develop osseous adaptations resulting in greater retroversion of the humeral head and consequently reduced IR ROM. 7 Studies on muscle strength have demonstrated variable findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%