2018
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-334-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hip and Knee Kinematics and Kinetics During Landing Tasks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: During single- and double-legged landing tasks, individuals with ACLR demonstrated meaningful reductions in injured-limb knee-extension moments and vertical ground reaction forces. These findings indicate potential unloading of the injured limb after ACLR, which may have significant implications for secondary ACL injury and long-term joint health.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
67
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
8
67
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the passed-RTS group, despite appropriate improvement in the muscle strength and functional performance (LSI ≥ 90%), lower hip abduction angle was found compared to the healthy group. This result is consistent with previous studies that reported a tendency toward hip adduction during walking and landing in individuals with ACLR who returned to play [25, 32]. Research suggest an association between ACL injury and excessive hip adduction and internal rotation during multiplanar movement, e.g., landing [8, 33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the passed-RTS group, despite appropriate improvement in the muscle strength and functional performance (LSI ≥ 90%), lower hip abduction angle was found compared to the healthy group. This result is consistent with previous studies that reported a tendency toward hip adduction during walking and landing in individuals with ACLR who returned to play [25, 32]. Research suggest an association between ACL injury and excessive hip adduction and internal rotation during multiplanar movement, e.g., landing [8, 33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Hip abduction (mean diff = 4.5°), hip external rotation (mean diff = 5.6°), and ankle inversion (mean diff = 7.8°) were significantly lower in the failed-RTS group compared to the healthy group. Previous studies also reported significant differences between the ACLR and healthy groups in peak hip flexion [17, 24], hip abduction/adduction [25] and frontal plane knee motion [44]. Decreased hip abduction, external rotation and ankle inversion may increase tendency toward dynamic valgus phenomena in the initial phase of landing which is an important risk factor to ACL re-injury [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this limitation, the study sample size was in accordance with previous investigations that reported hip and knee kinetics and kinematics after ACL reconstruction and referred to sample sizes of between 11 and 35 patients. 21…”
Section: The Orthopaedic Journal Of Sports Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include relying primarily on (1) follow-up assessments of <2 years, which miss the time frame of long-term maintenance of activities, and (2) heterogeneous study populations of mixed graft sources, multiple age groups, or both sexes for a reported outcome. 8,15,21 Because knee function after ACL reconstruction is affected by patient age, 16,18 duration of follow-up, graft source, 32,33,37,41 and sex, 2,8,13,19,30,37,40 greater specificity of patient demographics and surgical procedure has been recommended, 21 and longer follow-up is required to evaluate function specifically during the maintenance phase after surgery. Furthermore, since ACL reconstruction is particularly justifiable in the young adult age group (ie, 18-35 years), 36 5-to 10-year follow-up could represent an optimal time frame for assessing maintenance of sports activities beyond the short-term recovery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%