1997
DOI: 10.1097/00042752-199707000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hip and Ankle Range of Motion in Elite Classical Ballet Dancers and Controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
62
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1,9 The findings from our study were comparable to these values. The small absolute difference of less than 3°in passive hip ER ROM we found between sides may not be clinically important and is probably unlikely to affect performance.…”
Section: Hip Er Romsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1,9 The findings from our study were comparable to these values. The small absolute difference of less than 3°in passive hip ER ROM we found between sides may not be clinically important and is probably unlikely to affect performance.…”
Section: Hip Er Romsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…1,2,5,7,9,10,13 Measured ROM can be expected to vary according to the testing position (supine, prone, sitting, or standing), the degree of hip flexion/extension, the testing of active versus passive ROM, the degree of stabilization and positioning of the pelvis, and the position of the contralateral limb. In addition, the dancer's gender, age, and level of training (novice, preprofessional, or professional) will also have an effect.…”
Section: Hip Er Rommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 According to Thomasen,24 dancers ideally achieve 180°of turnout by externally rotating the hips 70°u nilaterally, externally rotating the tibiae 5°unilater-ally, and externally rotating the feet 15°unilaterally, thereby adding up to 180°of bilateral turnout. Although some dancers do have unilateral hip external rotation ranges of motion exceeding 70°and can achieve ideal turnout with relative ease, numerous studies 1,3,6,8,10,12 have reported significantly lower values (between 39.7°and 52.0°) for the amount of passive hip external rotation in the typical ballet dancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some recommend the use of measurement protocols that include all the lower limb to assess the individual participation rate of each segment and joint [20][21][22] , others defend the use of measurements that simulate functional dance movements, based on the assumption that those measures will be more useful for doctors, teachers, and the dancers themselves 1,[23][24][25] . This discrepancy suggests there is no consensus on which protocol to follow in the turnout evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%