2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hints for possible low redshift oscillation around the best fit ΛCDM model in the expansion history of the universe

Abstract: We search for possible deviations from the expectations of the concordance ΛCDM model in the expansion history of the Universe by analysing the Pantheon Type Ia Supernovae (SnIa) compilation along with its Monte Carlo simulations using redshift binning. We demonstrate that the redshift binned best fit ΛCDM matter density parameter Ω0m and the best fit effective absolute magnitude $\cal M$ oscillate about their full dataset best fit values with considerably large amplitudes. Using the full covariance matrix of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this subsection, we present only the derived results of the Python code, however the two publicly available codes are fully consistent with each other. In particular, for the standard ΛCDM scenario we obtain M = 23.809 ± 0.011 and Ω 0m = 0.299 ± 0.022 (see the first row of Table I) in agreement with previous studies [9,77,78,80].…”
Section: Iii2 Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this subsection, we present only the derived results of the Python code, however the two publicly available codes are fully consistent with each other. In particular, for the standard ΛCDM scenario we obtain M = 23.809 ± 0.011 and Ω 0m = 0.299 ± 0.022 (see the first row of Table I) in agreement with previous studies [9,77,78,80].…”
Section: Iii2 Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…where H 0 = 100h km sec −1 M pc −1 . Even though this degenerate combination is marginalized in most cases [9,76], recent studies [77][78][79][80] argue that this process may lead to physical information loss, since a physical model with an abrupt transition on the absolute magnitude M at a low redshift z t has the potential to alleviate simultaneously the H 0 and growth tensions [81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88]. Hence, we decide to use this degenerate parameter in the minimization process.…”
Section: Iii1 Pantheon Dataset Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 of [49], but there the data used is intrinsically low redshift, whereas our diagnostic comprises Planck MCMC chains: the diagnostic mixes low and high redshifts. One also observes wiggles in matter density Ω m0 in the Pantheon dataset when it is binned according to redshift [54][55][56]. This observation is backed up by the compressed EðzÞ data reported originally in [57].…”
Section: A Dynamical Dark Energymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…★ leandros@uoi.gr 2021; Kazantzidis et al 2021;Sapone et al 2021;Dainotti et al 2021). It is therefore becoming increasingly likely that it is due to new physics and an extension of ΛCDM is required to explain this mismatch (Di Valentino et al 2021;Perivolaropoulos & Skara 2021a).…”
Section: The Hubble Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%