2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hinokitiol, an Advanced Bidentate Ligand for Uranyl Decorporation

Abstract: Despite the critical role actinide decorporation agents play in the emergency treatment of people in nuclear accidents and other scenarios that may cause internal contamination of actinides, new ligands have seldom been reported in recent decades because the current inventory has been limited to only a handful of functional groups. Therefore, new functional groups are always being urgently sought for the introduction of advanced actinide decorporation agents. Herein, a tropolone derivative, 2-hydroxy-6-(propan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An assay was first performed using ZnNa 3 -DTPA and TAM-2LI-MAM 2 as decorporation agents. Very significantly, in the TAM-2LI-MAM group, the U­(VI) removal efficiency increases to an ideal 95.4% in the kidneys and 81.2% in femurs (Figure b), which is the highest uranyl decorporation ratio reported so far based on a detailed comparison with several representative tetra- and bidentate ligands and ZnNa 3 -DTPA (Figure and Table S11). In sharp contrast, there is a minimal change in U­(VI) content in the ZnNa 3 -DTPA groups (Figure b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…An assay was first performed using ZnNa 3 -DTPA and TAM-2LI-MAM 2 as decorporation agents. Very significantly, in the TAM-2LI-MAM group, the U­(VI) removal efficiency increases to an ideal 95.4% in the kidneys and 81.2% in femurs (Figure b), which is the highest uranyl decorporation ratio reported so far based on a detailed comparison with several representative tetra- and bidentate ligands and ZnNa 3 -DTPA (Figure and Table S11). In sharp contrast, there is a minimal change in U­(VI) content in the ZnNa 3 -DTPA groups (Figure b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…12 Consequently, bidentate chelating agents tend to bind uranyl with a high stoichiometry (2 : 1 or 3 : 1), a factor contributing to their limited removal efficiency due to the low local concentration of chelators under physiological conditions. 13,14 Subsequent studies on polydentate ligands forming 1 : 1 uranyl complexes suggest that ligands adhering to the planar coordination mode of uranyl are generally superior to those with mismatched geometries, potentially explaining the poor uranium removal rate of DTPA. Consequently, our recent work has focused on optimizing planar ligands from the perspectives of coordinating numbers and binding affinities.…”
Section: The Uranyl Ion (Uo 2 2+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, benefiting from the latest advancement in uranium coordination chemistry, new effective ligands and promising design principles, such as the preorganization of collaborative ligands, have been developed recently. 104–107 More discussion in this regard will be presented in Section 3.2.3. With further studies on the mechanistic insights into the uranyl–ligand interactions, next-generation ligands with improved affinity and selectivity to uranyl ions in ocean environments could be envisioned.…”
Section: Uranium Adsorbents: Function-oriented Design and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%