1996
DOI: 10.2130/jjesp.35.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hindsight Bias: A Cross-Cultural Analysis

Abstract: We examined whether differences found between Japanese and North Americans on a variety of self-serving biases would also be observed for the hindsight bias. In fact, Japanese and Canadians exhibited similar hindsight biases under memory instructions, and Canadians showed only a marginally more pronounced bias than Japanese underhypothetical instructions (where self-serving motivations appear more implicated). We suggest that cultural differences between Japanese and North Americans in distorted cognitions are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, two studies found a larger hindsight bias in Asian cultures compared with Western cultures (Choi & Nisbett, ; Yama et al, ). However, there are also findings showing a smaller hindsight bias in Asian cultures (Heine & Lehman, ) and no cultural differences at all (Pohl, Bender, & Lachmann, ). However, both these latter findings were obtained assessing hindsight bias with Almanac questions rather than events, which is fundamentally different because it is based on other mechanisms than causal modeling (Hoffrage, Hertwig, & Gigerenzer, ; Pohl, Eisenhauer, & Hardt, ).…”
Section: Hindsight Biasmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, two studies found a larger hindsight bias in Asian cultures compared with Western cultures (Choi & Nisbett, ; Yama et al, ). However, there are also findings showing a smaller hindsight bias in Asian cultures (Heine & Lehman, ) and no cultural differences at all (Pohl, Bender, & Lachmann, ). However, both these latter findings were obtained assessing hindsight bias with Almanac questions rather than events, which is fundamentally different because it is based on other mechanisms than causal modeling (Hoffrage, Hertwig, & Gigerenzer, ; Pohl, Eisenhauer, & Hardt, ).…”
Section: Hindsight Biasmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here it is useful to observe that psychologists working on mental state ascription explicitly classify both knowledge 10 In particular, we share a bias known as hindsight or more broadly epistemic egocentrism, a bias which distorts our mindreading of those who occupy a more naïve perspective, including our own more naïve past selves. There had been some suggestions that this bias differs across cultures: for example, one study found that the bias is worse under certain instructions for Western (Canadian) subjects than for Eastern (Japanese) subjects (Heine & Lehman, 1996), while another found greater hindsight on the Eastern (Korean) than on the Western (American) side (Choi & Nisbett, 2000). More comprehensive work has undermined claims of cross-cultural differences in either direction (Pohl, Bender, & Lachmann, 2002).…”
Section: Intuitive Mindreading Amateur and Professionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also occurs across many domains and paradigms (Blank, Fischer, & Erdfelder, 2003;Bryant & Brockway, 1997;Keysar, Ginzel, & Bazerman, 1995;Mark & Mellor, 1991;Tykocinski, Pick, & Kedmi, 2002). It occurs across cultures (Heine & Lehman, 1996;Pohl, Bender, & Lachmann, 2002) and has been documented in many applied settings (see Guilbault, Bryant, Brockway, &Posavac, 2004, andHawkins & for reviews).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%