ABSTRACT. Fishes from the late Eocene and Oligocene Jebel Qatrani Formation of the Fayum, Egypt, have been collected for many years, but have not been extensively studied. Collections from various sites in the formation, predominantly representing riverine and shallow lake deposits, include remains of several ®shes not known previously. The teleost ®shes from these collections [representing Characiformes, Siluriformes, Cichlidae, Latidae ( Centropomidae), and Channidae] include species that are similar to those found in the older, underlying, Qasr el Sagha Formation (cat®shes), as well as species of ®shes previously unrecorded from the Fayum (cichlids and latids), or even from the Tertiary of Africa (channids). It has been suggested that the Jebel Qatrani Formation represents an area of swampy rivers with overgrown banks and¯oating vegetation and at least one small lake. The ®sh remains support this reconstruction of the palaeoenvironment, and further indicate that open riverine habitat was also probably available.KEY WORDS: Channidae, Characiformes, Cichlidae, Egypt, Fayum, Latidae, Siluriformes. Priem 1905;Weiler 1929). Overlying the Qasr el Sagha Formation is the Jebel Qatrani Formation, which contains deposits ranging from late Eocene through Oligocene in age. The only ®sh remains previously reported from this formation are bones of cat®shes and lung®shes (Stromer 1916;Peyer 1928; Greenwood 1974) and characiform teeth (Roberts 1975). Teleost material collected from several localities in the Jebel Qatrani Formation by the team of Dr Elwyn Simons of Duke University in cooperation with the Egyptian Geological Survey, includes previously unreported or new species belonging to Cichlidae, Channidae and Latidae, in addition to cat®sh and characiform remains.The Jebel Qatrani Formation was once considered to represent¯uvio-marine conditions (e.g. Peyer 1928); however, Bown and Kraus (1988) found that the formation documents almost exclusively¯uvial conditions. It was probably laid down in alluvial conditions during the retreat of the Tethys Sea (Kappelman et al. 1992). Rasmussen et al. (2001) noted that the formation consists mainly of sandstones and mudstones deposited as river bars and overbank sediment, and suggested that the formation accumulated as part of an aggrading system of river channels, which¯owed primarily westward into a basin south of the Tethys Sea shoreline. Their studies led to the reconstruction of the depositional environment as a lowland area of tropical swamp forests, marshes and meandering rivers that probably had a monsoonal climate (Rasmussen et al. 2001).The ®sh material discussed in this paper comes from several different sites (Text-®g. 1) in the formation, which is separated by the Barite Sandstone into upper and lower parts. The three sites below the Barite Sandstone, locality 41 (L-41) and quarries B and E, along with quarries G and V above the sandstone are [Palaeontology, Vol. 47, Part 3, 2004, pp. 711±724] q The Palaeontological Association dated as late Eocene. The other ®ve s...