2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2010.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hindfoot Arthrodesis for Management of Bone Loss Following Calcaneus Fractures and Nonunions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterogeneity of the studies was estimated by I 2 statistic value. Three articles did the sensitivity analyses or subgroup analysis according to methodological quality, whereas the other two did not (Table 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heterogeneity of the studies was estimated by I 2 statistic value. Three articles did the sensitivity analyses or subgroup analysis according to methodological quality, whereas the other two did not (Table 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcaneal fracture (CF) is one of the most common fractures of the tarsal, accounting for approximately 60% of all tarsal fractures and 2% of all adult fractures. 1,2 In all CFs, displaced intra-articular fractures represent about 60–75%. 3 Falling injuries represent the most common cause for CFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 Falls from a height and motor-vehicle accident are the major cause of these large force compression injuries, causing widening of the heel, loss of heel height, and large amounts of articular surface displacement. 18 , 19 Although not life-threatening, these injuries may result in permanent disability. Open reduction and internal fixation has been established as a standard therapy for calcaneal fractures with good to excellent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the short and long terms, both types of procedures have complications, including superficial and deep infection, nonunion, malunion, neurovascular injury, complex regional pain syndrome, asymptomatic and symptomatic arthritis development in adjacent joints, and hardware prominence and failure requiring secondary procedures. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]13,14,17,18,22,27,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] SUMMARY After conservative measures have failed, both arthroscopic and open subtalar joint arthrodesis techniques can successfully be used to treat conditions causing pain, deformity, or both. Each technique has its own set of indications, contraindications, and complications.…”
Section: Bothmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, an open approach to subtalar joint arthrodesis is preferred for conditions involving large hindfoot deformity or malalignment, significant bone loss of the talus or calcaneus, prior subtalar joint nonunion or malunion, and cases requiring large bone grafting. 2,[6][7][8][9][10][15][16][17][18] Open subtalar joint arthrodesis is particularly useful in treatment of calcaneus fracture malunion; in addition to posttraumatic arthritis caused by articular cartilage injury, these injuries often heal with loss of calcaneal height, varus, heel widening with subsequent calcaneal-fibular impingement and peroneal tendon and sural nerve irritation, anterior ankle impingement caused by loss of normal talus declination, and calcanealcuboid joint impingement. 5,9 Surgical techniques to address these sequelae that are not possible with an isolated arthroscopic approach include decompression of the lateral wall of the calcaneus, distraction bone-block arthrodesis of the subtalar joint to restore calcaneal height, bone grafting to address large amounts of bone loss, and corrective osteotomies, all of which can be performed in concert with an open subtalar arthrodesis (Fig.…”
Section: Indications and Contraindicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%