2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.11.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hindered diffusion of proteins in mixture adsorption on porous anion exchangers and impact on flow-through purification of large proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, here the chosen resin pore size was bigger than that of the Q Sepharose FF used in the original study and was estimated to lie between 29 and 45 nm . In addition, live protein uptake as well as static binding results confirmed much higher levels of protein absorption and therefore could not be used as our hypothesis …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, here the chosen resin pore size was bigger than that of the Q Sepharose FF used in the original study and was estimated to lie between 29 and 45 nm . In addition, live protein uptake as well as static binding results confirmed much higher levels of protein absorption and therefore could not be used as our hypothesis …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…‐v), rejecting the ‘incomplete bead saturation’ hypothesis and suggesting that species other than intact monomers were the cause origin of the ring structure. Another logical reason for ring formation has been suggested to be large protein size and small resin pores . However, here the chosen resin pore size was bigger than that of the Q Sepharose FF used in the original study and was estimated to lie between 29 and 45 nm .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology frontiersin.org 2017), have been developed to increase pore diffusion while reducing steric hindrance (Anspach et al, 1989;Matlschweiger et al, 2019). Some manufacturers have also added porosity data to their documented resin specifications, which previously reported only the (dynamic) binding capacity, approximate particle diameter and average pore size.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large pore size of POROS 50 HQ (1726 nm) enhances mass transfer rates due to intraparticle convection and diffusion without compromising the binding capacity ( Yao and Lenhoff, 2006 ). Matlschweiger et al demonstrated that the binding capacity of thyroglobulin (680 kDa) is five times larger when using POROS 50 HQ rather than Q Sepharose FF (60 nm pore size), evidencing the promising balance between transport kinetics and binding capacity of perfusion resins ( Matlschweiger et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Pegylationmentioning
confidence: 99%