2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-017-0614-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HiMod Reduction of Advection–Diffusion–Reaction Problems with General Boundary Conditions

Abstract: We extend the hierarchical model reduction procedure previously introduced in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, for small values of h , the error is dominated by the modal component. The convergence rate is linear with respect to the reciprocal of the number of modes, which is consistent with the results in Aletti et al on slabs.HiMod is sensibly competitive with respect to the standard FEM in terms of accuracy and efficiency. For a given number of DOFs, the HiMod error is consistently about one order of magnitude lower than the FEM error (Figure , right).…”
Section: Scalar Advection‐diffusion‐reaction Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, for small values of h , the error is dominated by the modal component. The convergence rate is linear with respect to the reciprocal of the number of modes, which is consistent with the results in Aletti et al on slabs.HiMod is sensibly competitive with respect to the standard FEM in terms of accuracy and efficiency. For a given number of DOFs, the HiMod error is consistently about one order of magnitude lower than the FEM error (Figure , right).…”
Section: Scalar Advection‐diffusion‐reaction Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… In the “top‐down” approach, we construct directly the bivariate basis function in false(truer^,trueϑ^false) by solving an SLE problem associated with an appropriate self‐adjoint differential operator defined on the unit‐disk, completed with the homogeneous boundary conditions of the original problem to solve. We mimic in this way the “educated approach” introduced in Aletti et al for ADR problems in slabs, where tensor product splitting allows to simplify the 2D computation to 1D SLE problems. In the “bottom‐up” approach, we factorize the construction of the basis by working along truer^ and trueϑ^, separately, and assembling the bivariate basis afterwards. Boundary conditions are then enforced at a second stage.…”
Section: Himod In Cylindrical Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For more details about the choice of the modal basis, we refer to [2,14,20], while V h 1D may be a classical finite element space [4,17,18,20] or an isogeometric function space [21].…”
Section: The Hi-mod Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%