2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Himalayan Paleogene Foreland Basin, its collision induced early volcanic history and failed rift initiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Cretaceous, due to the effect of shift and rotation of the Indian plate, the tectonic stress was mainly stretched and tensional in east-westward direction with dextral strike-slip shear characteristics and the transtensional faults were well developed, trending from northwest to southeast (Figure 3). In all, the Cretaceous fault system in the S Block is well developed, and the fault contact relationship is complex (Robson et al 2018;Feng et al 2018;Nabavi et al 2019;Acharyyaa and Saha 2018;Shabeer et al 2018;Teng et al 2017). From the latest seismic interpretation result and based on a series of fault factors, such as fault strike, fault throw, fault extension length and its cutting relation to stratum, the fault system is divided into three types: Type I (main faults), Type II (secondary faults) and Type III (interlayer small faults) (Table 1).…”
Section: Fault Classification and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Cretaceous, due to the effect of shift and rotation of the Indian plate, the tectonic stress was mainly stretched and tensional in east-westward direction with dextral strike-slip shear characteristics and the transtensional faults were well developed, trending from northwest to southeast (Figure 3). In all, the Cretaceous fault system in the S Block is well developed, and the fault contact relationship is complex (Robson et al 2018;Feng et al 2018;Nabavi et al 2019;Acharyyaa and Saha 2018;Shabeer et al 2018;Teng et al 2017). From the latest seismic interpretation result and based on a series of fault factors, such as fault strike, fault throw, fault extension length and its cutting relation to stratum, the fault system is divided into three types: Type I (main faults), Type II (secondary faults) and Type III (interlayer small faults) (Table 1).…”
Section: Fault Classification and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image shows the Himalayan Foreland basin with a marked inset for the Kangra and Subathu basins. ITS , Indus Tsangpo Suture; MCT , Main Central Thrust; MBT , Main Boundary Thrust; MFT , Main Frontal Thrust (after Acharyya, ; Acharyya & Saha, ). (C) Geological map of the Kangra Basin (after Raiverman et al ., ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E-W elongated IGP shaped in response to the collision of the Indian plate, and Eurasian Plate that caused the uplift of Himalaya initiated in the Palaeogene is an active foreland basin (DEWEY JF and BIRD JM, 1970), (Singh, 2013)(Acharyya and Saha, 2018). The region integrates numerous covered faults and ridges in its basement (Valdiya, 1970) (Acharyya and Saha, 2018). In the IGP, groups of significant ridges added due to seismotectonic movements of the basements.…”
Section: Seismotectonic Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%