2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.14.512218
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hill-type computational models of muscle-tendon actuators: a systematic review

Abstract: Backed by a century of research and development, Hill-type muscle-tendon models are extensively used for countless applications. Lacking recent reviews, the field of Hill-type modelling is however dense and hard-to-explore, with detrimental consequences on knowledge transmission, inter-study consistency, and innovation. Here we present the first systematic review of the field of Hill-type muscle-tendon modelling. It aims to clarify the literature by detailing its contents and proposing updated terminology and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 309 publications
(532 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results clarify the directions for designing new surface grids of electrodes that could span across the entire surface of the muscle of interest while keeping a high density of electrodes, with IED as low as 2-4 mm. Identifying large sets of small and large motor units is relevant in many research areas related to motor control, such as the investigation of neural synergies (Hug et al, 2022), neuromuscular modelling (Caillet et al, 2022c), or human-machine interfacing (Farina et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results clarify the directions for designing new surface grids of electrodes that could span across the entire surface of the muscle of interest while keeping a high density of electrodes, with IED as low as 2-4 mm. Identifying large sets of small and large motor units is relevant in many research areas related to motor control, such as the investigation of neural synergies (Hug et al, 2022), neuromuscular modelling (Caillet et al, 2022c), or human-machine interfacing (Farina et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the muscle-related results obtained from MSK simulations are highly sensitive to some MSK parameters [43][44][45][46], including the muscle-specific maximum isometric force, tendon slack length, optimal fibre length, and the muscle moment arm. These parameters in the ARMs model may deviate from the specific subject, which will affect the estimation of muscle activation.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the workings of intra-muscular motion has broader implications than US interpretation and processing, such as in musculoskeletal modelling. Generally, a muscle is modeled as a single actuator [30], geometrically described as a line segment between its insertion points on the skeletal bodies [31], assuming all fibers have the same length and neuromuscular properties using multiscale simplifications [32]. Some muscle modeling developments have aimed for a more physiological underpinning by describing the dynamics of the individual MUs of the muscle, for example by using controlled pools of in-parallel mathematical models of individual MUs with artificial [29], [33]- [35] and experimentally generated [36] MU firing times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both approaches assume no inter-unit connectivity between the modeled fiber actuators. In such cases, the relative motions between fibers are assumed to be independent and their generated forces are modelled to add linearly, which contradicts physiological findings [32], [39]. Experimental insights into the true impacts of the inter-relation between MUs could improve these models, and US detection methods could enable a precise mapping of MUs within the muscle volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%